Bullying Prevention Program - Student Services / Prevention and ...
Bullying Prevention Program - Student Services / Prevention and ...
Bullying Prevention Program - Student Services / Prevention and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As stated above, three variables which can be interpreted as having negative results had to do<br />
with conditions in the schools which either ignored conditions which could lead to bullying, on<br />
one h<strong>and</strong>, or actively sought to prevent it, on the other. Those questions are: (a) a student’s<br />
willingness to go to teachers if bullied (question 24); (b) how seriously the school staff takes<br />
bullying (question 20); <strong>and</strong> (c) whether or not the staff is working to prevent bullying (question<br />
21). One interpretation of these findings is that the program erodes the teachers’ <strong>and</strong> school’s<br />
commitment to counteracting bullying. However, a more reasonable explanation is that after<br />
receiving the program the students in the treatment schools became more aware of conditions in<br />
their schools that allow bullying: a climate they had not noticed before. Having been made aware<br />
of conditions which might give rise to bullying the students do not see corresponding changes in<br />
the climate in their schools.<br />
Logically, these findings indicate the importance of an entire school staff addressing bullying as<br />
a serious issue <strong>and</strong> the importance of changes to school climate. It appears that combining the<br />
program with a concerted effort to change how staff perceive of bullying, making it clear to the<br />
students that everyone is available <strong>and</strong> willing to help, will decrease the potential for bullying<br />
even more.<br />
FUTURE EVALUATIONS<br />
The encouraging results of the evaluation of the Wisconsin <strong>Bullying</strong> <strong>Prevention</strong> <strong>Program</strong> make it<br />
important to continue evaluating the program. An important future study would test the<br />
psychometric properties of the survey instruments -- their reliability <strong>and</strong> validity -- <strong>and</strong> the<br />
appropriateness of the measurement technique used for 3 rd graders. A more dependable<br />
instrument would more accurately measure changes brought about by the program.<br />
Our evaluation looked at only the basic lessons. A more comprehensive study would compare (a)<br />
the basic program with (b) the basic program plus the booster sessions <strong>and</strong> the ancillary activities<br />
on social <strong>and</strong> emotional learning.<br />
86 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction