Overt Nominative Subjects in Infinitival Complements Cross - NYU ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 2: Papers in Syntax, Spring 2009 20(82) Era importante [eles sairem].was important they leave-inf-3plÌt was important for them to leave’Hungarian has optionally inflected infinitives. The suspicion might arise that the nominativesubjects in Hungarian infinitives are related to phonetically overt or covert infinitival inflection.But this is unlikely. Inflected infinitives in Hungarian occur only as complements of impersonalpredicates that do not carry person-number agreement and, as Tóth (2000) discusses in detail,they always have dative subjects:(83) Fontos volt / Sikerültimportant was / succeededa. ... délre elkészülni / elkészülnöm.by.noon be.ready-inf be.ready-inf-1sg`to be ready / for me to be ready by noon’b. ... nekem is délre elkészülni / elkészülnöm.dative.1sg too by.noon be.ready-inf be.ready-inf-1sg`for me too to be ready by noon’c. ... az ebédnek délre elkészülni / elkészülnie.the lunch.dative by.noon be.ready-inf be.ready-inf-3sg`for the lunch to be ready by noon’(Example (83b) is ambiguous: the dative DP `for me’ could be either the experiencer of thematrix predicate or the subject of the infinitive. In (83c) the dative DP `for the lunch’ cannot bean experiencer, only the subject of `to be ready by noon’.)Tóth’s observations are important, because they show a crucial difference betweenHungarian and Portuguese inflected infinitives. Even if inflected infinitives do license overtnominatives in Portuguese and in other languages, infinitival inflection cannot be the universalprecondition for the existence of overt nominative subjects in infinitives. This supports theconclusion that the critical factor is agreement with a finite verb.When the control or raising verb itself is an inflected infinitive, its own infinitivalcomplement cannot have an overt nominative subject. The presence of a dative DP `for me’would not make a difference:(84) *Fontos volt [akarnom [én is jó jegyeket kapni]].important was want.inf.1sg I.nom too good grades.acc get.infintended: Ìt was important for me to want that I too get good grades’(85) *Fontos volt [nem elkezdenem [én is rossz jegyeket kapni]].important was not begin.inf.1sg I.nom too bad grades.acc get.infintended: Ìt was important for me not to begin to get bad grades too’This confirms that the verbal agreement be of the kind that normally licenses nominativesubjects; we have seen above that agreement on infinitives never do that.The finite clause whose verb agrees with the infinitival subject need not be subjacent tothat infinitival clause. In (86) the intervening infinitives akarni `want-inf’ and elkezdeni `begin-
NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 2: Papers in Syntax, Spring 2009 21inf’ do not carry inflection, although they could agree with én if they were finite.(86) Nem fogok akarni elkezdeni [én is rossz jegyeket kapni].not will-1sg want-inf begin-inf I -nom too bad grades-acc get-infÌ will not want to begin [to get bad grades too]’2.4.3 One finite verb, multiple overt subjectsThe examples discussed so far contained only one overt subject, either in the finite or in aninfinitival clause. The examples were natural, because Hungarian is an Italian-type null subjectlanguage: unstressed subject pronouns are not pronounced. But notice that pro subjects occur inthe same environments as overt subjects. Therefore not only the overt infinitival subject but alsothe null finite subject must agree with the finite verb. In other words, our control constructionsrequire multiple agreement. The availability of multiple agreement is the default assumption inMinimalism. Support for this analysis comes from the fact that it is perfectly possible formultiple overt subjects to co-occur with a single agreeing finite verb. The sentences belowrequire a contrastive context, but when it is available, they are entirely natural and indeed theonly way the express the intended propositions. Imagine a situation where a group of people,including János, is faced with a crowded bus: some will certainly have to walk.(87) János nem akart [megpróbálni [csak ő menni busszal]]John not wanted.3sg try.inf only he go.inf bus.with`John didn’t want to try to be the only one who takes the bus’(88) Én se akarok [csak én menni busszal]I-neither want.1sg only I go.inf bus.with`Neither do I want to be the only one who takes the bus’(89) Senki nem akart [csak ő menni busszal]nobody not wanted.3sg only he/she go.inf bus.with`Nobody wanted to be the only one who takes the bus’(90) Nem akarok [én is megpróbálni [csak én menni busszal]]not want.1sg I too try.inf only I go.inf bus.withÌ don’t want to be another person who tries to be the only one who takes the bus’The status of multiple overt subjects in raising constructions is not clear to me:(91) ?János elkezdett [csak ő kapni szerepeket.John began.3sg only he get.inf roles-acc]Ìt began to be the case that only John got roles’(92) ?* Nem fogok [én is elkezdeni [nem én kapni szerepeket]]not will.1sg I too begin.inf not I get.inf roles-accÌt will not happen to me too that it begins to be the case that it is not me who getsroles’
Page 1: Overt Nominative Subjects in Infini
Page 4 and 5: NYU Working Papers in Linguistics,
Page 10: NYU Working Papers in Linguistics,
Page 55: NYU Working Papers in Linguistics,

Overt Nominative Subjects in Infinitival Complements Cross - NYU ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?