10.07.2015 Views

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Chemistry C(the gap is less than 0.01 eV), <strong>in</strong>duced by OH − impurities, arelocated 1.43 eV above the VB top at the Γ po<strong>in</strong>t. S<strong>in</strong>ce hydroxylhas weaker oxidative property than that <strong>of</strong> fluor<strong>in</strong>e, the hydroxyb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g force to the outer-shell electrons is smaller, lead<strong>in</strong>g tothe occupied OH − bands shift<strong>in</strong>g upward with respect to theVB top, ma<strong>in</strong>ly consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> F outer p orbitals. From Figure 3and Table 2, we conclude that the first optical absorption,correspond<strong>in</strong>g to an electron transition from the occupied OH −bands to the empty OH − band, should be centered around9.04 eV, be<strong>in</strong>g much larger than the relevant value <strong>of</strong> 4.24 eVfor CaF 2 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g F centers (an electron trapped <strong>in</strong> thefluor<strong>in</strong>e vacancy). 22 It is because the trapped electron <strong>in</strong> the Fcenter is more delocalized than the valence electron <strong>of</strong>hydroxyl. Unlike the (111)-oriented configurations, for ConfigOH (100) , the two occupied OH − bands separate slightly and thegap is around 0.05 eV.To further study the electronic structure and electrontransitions <strong>in</strong> a OH − -impurity system, we calculated the density<strong>of</strong> states (DOS) <strong>of</strong> the OH (111) system, as we can see <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.Articlecorrespond<strong>in</strong>g to the substitutional OH − impurity located atthe No. 1, 3, 4, and 6 fluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayers, respectively, as we cansee <strong>in</strong> Figure 5. As discussed before, hydroxyls orient the (111)Figure 5. Schematic sketch <strong>of</strong> the (111) slab conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g OH −impurities. The big and small circles denote oxygen and hydrogenatoms, respectively.Figure 4. Total and partial density <strong>of</strong> states (DOS) for the OH −impurities (Config OH (111) ) <strong>in</strong> the CaF 2 crystal.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our calculation, the O p orbitals form the twosuperposed occupied OH − bands, named O bands, and the Hs orbitals do the major contribution to the empty defect band(so-called H band) below the CB bottom. Unlike the occupiedO bands with a very sharp peak <strong>in</strong> the DOS figure, the DOS <strong>of</strong>the unoccupied H band is diffused and very close to the CB.Additionally, the O p orbitals also make some contribution to theVB top, as we can see Figure 4, which ma<strong>in</strong>ly consists <strong>of</strong> F porbitals <strong>in</strong> perfect CaF 2 crystal.B. OH − <strong>Impurities</strong> <strong>in</strong> the CaF 2 Surface. As an extension<strong>of</strong> previous studies on hydroxyl impurities <strong>in</strong> CaF 2 bulks, weperformed calculations for surface OH − impurities. For a (111)slab <strong>of</strong> CaF 2 , there are three sublayers <strong>in</strong> each F−Ca−F layerfrom the side view, and OH − impurities could be only locatedat the upper and lower fluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayers. So, a OH − at onefluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayer has two configurations correspond<strong>in</strong>g to thecases <strong>of</strong> O above H and H above O, labeled OH and HO,respectively, <strong>in</strong> this paper. We calculated eight differentconfigurations <strong>of</strong> the surface OH − impurities, named ConfigOH 11 , HO 11 , OH 12 , HO 12 , OH 21 , HO 21 , OH 22 , and HO 22 ,6395direction <strong>in</strong> CaF 2 bulks. However, we could not confirmwhether the OH − orients also along the (111) direction forsurface OH − -impurity systems. Therefore, we additionallysimulated the eight configurations mentioned above, butwhose <strong>in</strong>itial guessed orientations are not along the (111)axis accurately, <strong>in</strong> which some configurations do not convergeto the (111) direction after geometrical relaxations via a search<strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum total energy, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the (111)-orientedOH − is not the most stable configuration for surface OH − -impurity systems. We add the superscript (|) or (\) to expressthe (111)-oriented and (111)-unoriented OH − impurities,(|)respectively, such as Configs OH 11 and OH (\) 11 , etc. Ourcalculated results show that the energetically most favorableconfiguration for the surface OH − impurity is Config HO (\) 11 ,<strong>in</strong>which the angle between the OH − axis and the (111) directionis around 3.2°. Table 3 lists the relative energies <strong>of</strong> ConfigTable 3. Total Energies (eV) <strong>of</strong> All the Surface OH − -(\)aImpurity Configurations with Respect to Config HO 11(\) (|)sublayer HO OH HO OH11 0.00 +0.62 +0.09 +0.7012 +0.62 +0.73 +0.70 +1.0621 +0.62 +0.64 +0.95 +0.8222 +0.63 +0.76 +0.70 +1.14a (|) and (\) express the (111)-oriented and (111)-unoriented OH − ,respectively.HO (\) 11 for other configurations. It implicates a trend <strong>of</strong> OH −impurities locat<strong>in</strong>g near the surface. From Table 3, we foundthat most <strong>of</strong> Configs HO have lower energies with respect tothe correspond<strong>in</strong>g Configs OH, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a preference <strong>of</strong> thehydrogen atom locat<strong>in</strong>g above the oxygen atom for the surfaceOH − -impurity systems, and the (111)-unoriented Configs aredx.doi.org/10.1021/jp211075g | J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6392−6400

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!