10.07.2015 Views

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

Ab Initio Calculations of Hydroxyl Impurities in CaF2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Chemistry CArticlethe more energetically favorable configurations with respect tothe correspond<strong>in</strong>g (111)-oriented Configs. Additionally, wealso calculated the (111) CaF 2 slabs full covered by OH − . Forthe full-covered slabs, hydroxyls can only replace the surfacefluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayer, so we may classify the full-covered slabs <strong>in</strong>t<strong>of</strong>our configurations, i.e., HO (|) full ,HO (\) full ,OH (|) full , and OH (\) full . Ourcalculated results demonstrate that the most stable full-coveredconfiguration is Config HO (\) full , <strong>in</strong> which the deviation angleequals around 2.2°, and the total energies <strong>of</strong> Configs HO (|) full ,OH (|) full , and OH (\) full are larger than that <strong>of</strong> Config HO (\) full by 0.06,0.63, and 0.58 eV, respectively. So, we can conclude that for thefull-covered slabs, hydrogen atoms prefer to locate aboveoxygen atoms obliquely. Configs HO (\) 11 and HO (\) full are morestable than other surface OH − systems; therefore, we ma<strong>in</strong>lyfocus our current discussion on these two Configs.The geometrical structures <strong>of</strong> the surface OH − are calculatedand depicted <strong>in</strong> Table 4. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our studies on bulkTable 4. Geometrical Properties <strong>of</strong> the Surface OH −<strong>Impurities</strong> a for all Configs(\) (|)sublayer HO OH HO OH11 0.96(3.2°) 0.97(28°) 0.97 0.9812 0.97(5.3°) 0.97(58.1°) 0.97 0.9621 0.97(65.0°) 0.96(4.8°) 0.96 0.9722 0.97(5.0°) 0.96(57.9°) 0.97 0.95full 0.96(2.2°) 0.97(2.5°) 0.97 0.98a OH − length (Å) and deviation angle shown <strong>in</strong> brackets.OH − -impurity systems, the lengths <strong>of</strong> OH − <strong>in</strong> CaF 2 and BaF 2 ,as well as <strong>in</strong> H 2 O, Ca(OH) 2 , and Ba(OH) 2 , are all around0.96−0.97 Å, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the OH − as a diatomic group has asteady geometrical structure. Our calculated CaF 2 surface OH − -impurity lengths for all the configurations are around 0.96−0.98 Å,as we can see <strong>in</strong> Table 4. It is implied that the surface effect onthe length <strong>of</strong> surface hydroxyls is not remarkable. From Table4, we found that some Configs, such as OH (\) 12 ,HO (\) 21 , andOH (\) 22 , have very big deviation angles (around 60°), and theorientations <strong>of</strong> other Configs approach the (111) direction. Inan ideal cubic CaF 2 bulk, the angle between the (111) and(100) axes is 54.7°, be<strong>in</strong>g close to those big obliquities <strong>of</strong>around 60°. Therefore, we can consider these Configs with bigdeviation angles as Config OH (100) , namely, the (100)-orientedconfiguration <strong>in</strong> the bulk case, locat<strong>in</strong>g near the (111) surface.It is implied that despite the (111)-oriented OH − be<strong>in</strong>genergetically more favorable <strong>in</strong> CaF 2 bulk, hydroxyls located atsome specific fluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayers near the surface prefer the(100) orientation. Here, we can classify the eight (111)-unorientedconfigurations <strong>in</strong>to three OH − types, i.e., OH (111) ,HO (111) ,andOH (100) <strong>in</strong> the bulk case. Configs OH (\) 11 ,HO (\) 12 ,OH (\) (\)21 ,andHO 22belong to the OH (111) type, Config HO (\) 11 belongs to the HO (111)type, and Configs OH (\) 12 , HO (\) (\)21 , and OH 22 belongs to theOH (100) type. From Tables 3 and 4 and this classification, we canconclude that OH − impurities with HO (111) ,OH (111) ,OH (100) ,andOH (111) configurations prefer to locate at the No.1, 3, 4, and 6fluor<strong>in</strong>e sublayers, respectively.The relaxations <strong>of</strong> atoms surround<strong>in</strong>g the surface OH −impurity are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6 and Table 5. For ConfigHO (\) 11 , all the atoms near the surface shift toward the positiveY-axis from the top view, as we can see Figure 6. The oxygenand the six nearest fluor<strong>in</strong>e atoms, i.e., F1, F2, and F3, on theupper sublayer <strong>of</strong> the first layer have considerable XY-shifts6396Figure 6. Top view <strong>of</strong> the surface OH − -impurity nearest-neighborgeometry with an <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> relaxation shifts for Config HO (\) 11 . Thedirections <strong>of</strong> atomic displacements <strong>in</strong> the XY-plane are shown witharrows. The fluor<strong>in</strong>e and calcium atoms <strong>in</strong> different shells are labeled.The upper and lower panels denote the first and second layers <strong>of</strong> the(111) CaF 2 slab, respectively.over 2% <strong>of</strong> a 0 , the XY-displacements <strong>of</strong> fluor<strong>in</strong>e atoms locatedat the lower sublayer <strong>of</strong> the first layer and the upper sublayer <strong>of</strong>the second layer are around 1−2% <strong>of</strong> a 0 , and the XYtranslations<strong>of</strong> the fluor<strong>in</strong>e atoms on the lower sublayer <strong>of</strong> thesecond layer equal 0.7% <strong>of</strong> a 0 approximately. Here, we canconclude that the atomic layers conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g surface OH −impurities have a remarkable XY-translation. Because <strong>of</strong> thesurface shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g effect, the atomic coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> thesurface atoms reduce, whereas the oxygen atom shifts outwardfrom the surface by around 2.22% <strong>of</strong> a 0 . Table 5 also lists thedisplacements <strong>of</strong> atoms at the top two layers for Config HO (\) full ,i.e., the full-covered case. Similar to Config HO (\) 11 , the toplayers have an obvious XY-translation with respect to thedeeper layers and the surface OH − layer moves upward byaround 3.32% <strong>of</strong> a 0 , implicat<strong>in</strong>g a dilat<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>in</strong>duced by fullcover<strong>in</strong>ghydroxyls.Table 6 presents the effective charges <strong>of</strong> the surface OH − forall the (111)-unoriented configurations. The OH − charges formost Configs are larger than the OH − charge <strong>in</strong> the CaF 2 bulk(−0.722 e). Especially for Config HO (\) 11 , the effective charge <strong>of</strong>the surface OH − equals −0.746 e and is larger by around 0.024 e.Because <strong>of</strong> the surface effect, −0.005 e localized on thehydrogen atom transfers <strong>in</strong>ward toward the surface and the oxygenatom attracts −0.028 e from the surround<strong>in</strong>g atoms. We alsocalculated the effective charges <strong>of</strong> atoms surround<strong>in</strong>g the OH −impurity,aswecansee<strong>in</strong>Table5.Thechargedifferences<strong>of</strong>thedeeper fluor<strong>in</strong>e and calcium atoms are negligible, whereas thedx.doi.org/10.1021/jp211075g | J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6392−6400

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!