NFEPA Atlas 5.3_20111025_FINAL.indd - Biodiversity GIS - SANBI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Part 3: National mapproducts3.1 Density of Freshwater Ecosystem PriorityAreas per Water Management AreaThis part of the atlas presents six national maps that show:3.1 Density of FEPAs per Water Management Areacalculated as the percentage of the total area of thatWater Management Area that has been identified as aFEPA or associated sub-quaternary catchment3.2 Density of FEPAs per sub-Water Management Areacalculated as the percentage of the total area of thatsub-Water Management Area that has been identified as aFEPA or associated sub-quaternary catchment3.3 Free-flowing rivers of South Africa, or rivers withoutdams that flow undisturbed from their source to theconfluence with a larger river or to the sea3.4 Fish sanctuaries for threatened and near threatened fishspecies indigenous to South Africa3.5 High water yield areas, which are sub-quaternarycatchments where mean annual runoff is at least threetimes more than the average for the related primarycatchment3.6 High groundwater recharge areas, which are subquaternarycatchments where groundwater recharge is atleast three times more than the average for the relatedprimary catchmentCaroline GelderblomFreshwater biodiversity is not evenlydistributed across the country; some WaterManagement Areas have a higher densityof FEPAs than others, and thus moreresponsibility for meetingnational freshwater ecosystem goals.Figure 3.1 shows the proportion of each Water Management Area identified as a FEPA,calculated as the percentage of the total area of that Water Management Area that hasbeen identified as a FEPA or associated sub-quaternary catchment. This map shows thatsome Water Management Areas (those that are darker in colour) have more FEPAs to lookafter than others. However, lighter coloured Water Management Areas still have FEPAs toprioritise, just not as many. An important policy question is how we can support WaterManagement Areas with a high proportion of FEPAs in achieving our national freshwaterecosystem goals.The proportion of each Water Management Area made up of FEPAs varies from 10% in theBerg Water Management Area to 38% in the Thukela. This variability is a consequence ofriver and wetland ecosystem heterogeneity and fish species distribution. For example, theInkomati and Usutu to Mhlathuze Water Management Areas have high river ecosystemheterogeneity, and therefore a high proportion of FEPAs (32 and 33% respectively).The proportion of FEPAs in each Water Management Area is also influenced by rivercondition, because only rivers that are still in good condition (A or B ecological category)can be chosen as FEPAs. For example, the Crocodile (West) and Marico and Olifants WaterManagement Areas have high river ecosystem heterogeneity, but there are no longersufficient rivers in a good condition to meet biodiversity targets for river ecosystems,reducing the number of FEPAs identified. The small proportion of FEPAs identified in theseWater Management Areas are generally the only ones left in a good condition. This meansthat FEPAs in low density Water Management Areas are no less important than those in highdensity areas. In fact, in cases where low density of FEPAs results from poor condition ofrivers and wetlands, the FEPAs that have been identified are arguably more important.National map products - 34 -
% Area of WMA selected as FEPA10213012143338202313373823243321 1820102218500 kmFigure 3.1: Density of Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Areas per Water Management AreaNational map products - 35 -
Page 2 and 3: Front Cover: Clanwilliam and Fiery
Page 4 and 5: AcknowledgementsThe development of
Page 6 and 7: Table of ContentsPart 1:Introductio
Page 8 and 9: Part 1: IntroductionThis section de
Page 10 and 11: 1.2 Guiding principles for managing
Page 12 and 13: 1.3.3 Destruction or degradation of
Page 15 and 16: 1.5 History of freshwater biodivers
Page 17 and 18: Part 2: FreshwaterEcosystem Priorit
Page 19 and 20: Box 2.1. Policy mechanisms supporte
Page 21 and 22: WMA 1LegendLIMPOPOTownSub-quaternar
Page 23 and 24: WMA 3CROCODILE(WEST) AND MARICOLege
Page 25 and 26: WMA 5INKOMATILegendSabieTownSub-qua
Page 27 and 28: WMA 7THUKELALegendBuffaloTownSub-qu
Page 29 and 30: WMA 9MIDDLE VAALMiddle VaalRhenoste
Page 31 and 32: WMA 11MVOTI TO UMZIMKULUMvotiLegend
Page 33 and 34: WMA 13UPPER ORANGERiet/ModderLesoth
Page 35 and 36: WMA 15FISH TO TSITSIKAMMALegendFish
Page 37 and 38: WMA 17OLIFANTS/DOORNSandveldKnersvl
Page 39: WMA 19BERGLegendTownSub-quaternary
Page 43 and 44: 3.3 Free-flowing riversA free-flowi
Page 45 and 46: The Mtentu River: An ecotourism ass
Page 47 and 48: The Elands River: A unique biodiver
Page 49 and 50: For species and species lineages co
Page 51 and 52: The map of high water yield areas w
Page 53 and 54: 0 10 20 30 40 50BERGBREEDECROCODILE
Page 55 and 56: 4.1.2 Flow variability categoriesTh
Page 57 and 58: % River length0 20 40 60 80 1004.2
Page 59 and 60: 4.4 Wetland conditionWetland condit
Page 61: 4.6 Wetland vegetation groupsWetlan
Page 64 and 65: Nel, J.L., Roux, D.J., Cowling, R.M
Page 66 and 67: Fish Support Area: Fish sanctuaries

NFEPA Atlas 5.3_20111025_FINAL.indd - Biodiversity GIS - SANBI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?