10.07.2015 Views

faculty of pure and applied sciences - The Department of Chemistry ...

faculty of pure and applied sciences - The Department of Chemistry ...

faculty of pure and applied sciences - The Department of Chemistry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-13 THE PERSISTENCE OF MIRAL 500CS ON TWO COFFEEFARMS IN JAMAICADwight E. Robinson<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Life Sciences, MonaSerious outbreaks <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>of</strong>fee leaf miner (CLM), Perileucoptera c<strong>of</strong>feella, during 1991 - 1995prompted the spraying <strong>of</strong> several insecticides, particularly Miral 500CS (isaz<strong>of</strong>os), which wasfound to be quite effective in suppressing the CLM (Reid <strong>and</strong> Robinson, 1994). However, concernsabout its persistence in the environment <strong>and</strong> possible impact on non-target organisms prompted thefollowing study which was aimed at determining its persistence in two varied c<strong>of</strong>fee cultivatingconditions <strong>of</strong> Jamaica.<strong>The</strong> study was carried out on a Blue Mountain plantation (Mavis Bank) <strong>and</strong> another in the highl<strong>and</strong>s<strong>of</strong> St. Catherine (Mountain Hill). Sample plots <strong>of</strong> 0.2 ha with about 250 trees were selected on eachfarm <strong>and</strong> treated with Miral 500CS at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 3 mL/L. A 625 m 2 area <strong>of</strong> soil under treeswas demarcated in a separate area <strong>and</strong> treated similarly. Thirty leaves <strong>and</strong> berries were r<strong>and</strong>omlypicked from treated trees <strong>and</strong> a 100g sub-sample <strong>of</strong> soil taken from a mixture <strong>of</strong> ten 60-g soilsamples taken at r<strong>and</strong>om from the treated soil area. Samples were collected 2 hours <strong>and</strong> 1, 3, 7, 14<strong>and</strong> 21 days after treatment for extraction <strong>and</strong> analysis in the laboratory. Rainfall was also recorded.Samples were weighed, extracted in methylene chloride by shaking on a wrist action shaker, filtered<strong>and</strong> cleaned on a florisil column. Cleaned extracts were concentrated to 10 mL <strong>and</strong> analyzed on aShimadzu 9A gas chromatograph equipped with an FPD chromatopack data system. Analyticalconditions were: glass column, 1.6 m by 2 mm packed with OV-17; carrier gas; nitrogen, at a flowrate <strong>of</strong> 30 - 35 mL/min; temperature settings <strong>of</strong> 230 o C for the column <strong>and</strong> 260 o C for the injector <strong>and</strong>detector. <strong>The</strong> detection limit for isaz<strong>of</strong>os was 0.004 ng. Probit analysis was used to determine thehalf life <strong>of</strong> the insecticide on each substrate.<strong>The</strong> half life <strong>of</strong> Miral 500CS on c<strong>of</strong>fee leaves <strong>and</strong> in soil was 7-fold greater in the Blue Mountainthan highl<strong>and</strong> plantation (Table). This trend was reversed for the berries as the loss <strong>of</strong> Miral 500CSfrom the berries was 3-fold greater on the Blue Mountain than the highl<strong>and</strong> plantation. Variations inpersistence <strong>of</strong> the insecticide on leaves <strong>and</strong> berries <strong>of</strong> the plantations may be attributed to differingenvironmental conditions such as precipitation, temperature, sunlight <strong>and</strong> wind velocity, whichwould all impact on the insecticide’s loss <strong>and</strong> degradation (Edwards, 1975; Hill <strong>and</strong> Wright, 1978).In addition to these factors, its persistence in the soil would also be influenced by soil properties suchas the organic matter content.<strong>The</strong>re is a direct correlation between the persistence <strong>of</strong> insecticides in soil <strong>and</strong> organic matter content<strong>of</strong> the soil (Arnold <strong>and</strong> Briggs, 1990) which would explain the greater persistence <strong>of</strong> Miral 500CS inMavis Bank than Mountain Hill soil which had 4.55 <strong>and</strong> 1.15% organic matter, respectively. Itshould be noted that the half-lives presented were obtained under conditions <strong>of</strong> high rainfall (94 <strong>and</strong>128 mm in Mountain Hill <strong>and</strong> Mavis Bank, respectively) which is indicative <strong>of</strong> the highenvironmental persistence <strong>of</strong> Miral 500CS. It is, therefore, obvious that encapsulation <strong>of</strong> the activeingredient, in an attempt to reduce its hazardous effects, has resulted in its increased persistence inthe environment, thus prolonging possible harmful effects.35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!