10.07.2015 Views

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5. Numerical results and experimental validationcantly affected by both fiber <strong>di</strong>ameter which varies from d f = 0.8 to 2.0mm, and theembedded lengths, varying from l emb = 22.1 to 35.0mm. The proposed procedure isable to realistically capture the influences of both parameters.MPa3.02.52.01.51.035 648Pi N71400.591100.00 5 10 15 20120 7100 680 5 460 3 840 220 19 1000.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7zmm(b)si mm(a)1.2strain 1.E31.0760.8540.60.43820.2 91100.00 5 10 15 20zmm(c)Figure 4.14: Pull-out simulation for a steel fiber <strong>di</strong>ameter of 0.8mm and an embedded lengthof 22.1mm by Banholzer et al. [2006]: (a) load-slip curve P i − s i , (b) interface shear stress<strong>di</strong>stributions τ − z and (c) axial strain <strong>di</strong>stributions ε s − z.Only the numerical results based on the fracture energy modeling are outlined and compared against the experimental evidence in this section. The bilinear bond-sliprelationship posses, as demonstrated in subsection 4.5.1, a limited pre<strong>di</strong>ction capabilityfor pull-out tests, compared to the fracture energy-based proposal. For this reason thebilinear bond-slip behavior is neglected in this section.Finally, the <strong>di</strong>scussion focuses on the detailed simulation of the complete debon<strong>di</strong>ngprocesses developing in the three cases whose overall response is described in Figure4.11 to 4.13. To this end, fiber-to-concrete bond stresses and fiber strain <strong>di</strong>stributionsthroughout the bond length are obtained by means of numerical simulations. Figure 4.14 to 4.16 show such results for <strong>di</strong>fferent bond lengths and <strong>di</strong>ameters. In particular,Figures 4.14b, 4.15b and 4.16b report the <strong>di</strong>stribution of interface shear stresses89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!