10.07.2015 Views

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

tesi A. Caggiano.pdf - EleA@UniSA - Università degli Studi di Salerno

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5. Model performance and numerical pre<strong>di</strong>ctionsσ [MPa]10.08.0ρ f = 6 %6.04.0ρ f = 3 %ρ f = 2 %2.00.0ρ f = 0 %Dramix Fibers0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Figure 5.2: Experimental data [Li et al., 1998] and numerical simulation for SFRC with Dramixfibers.εσ [MPa]10.08.06.0ρ f = 6 %4.02.0ρ f = 3 %ρ f = 2 %ρ f = 0 %Harex Fibers0.00.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010ε[MPa]Figure 5.3: Experimental data [Li et al., 1998] and numerical simulation for SFRC with Harexfibers.Beyond the general accuracy of the model pre<strong>di</strong>ctions and, consequently, the soundnessof its assumptions and formulation, the results in Figure 5.2 and 5.3 emphasize thestrong relationship between the mechanical behavior of FRCC and the fiber contentand quality. A progressive transition from the brittle failure mode characterizing thebehavior of plain concrete in tension to a more and more ductile post-peak responsecan be clearly recognized when the fiber content increases.Finally, the <strong>di</strong>agrams in Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the <strong>di</strong>fferent behavior of SFRC basedon Dramix and Harex fibers, both hooked at the end. The more ductile performance96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!