Differences in meristic counts <strong>of</strong> the genus Clarias35between 58 and 60. Teugels and Thys Van DenAudenaerde (1981) reported vertebrae ranges <strong>of</strong>59 to 62 in C ebriensis and 59 to 64 vertebrae inC. dahomeyensis. The VC in the present studyfalls within the 50 – 68 distribution <strong>of</strong> vertebrae inthe genus Clarias (Sydenham, 1978).Teugels and Thys Van Den Audenaerde(1981), while comparing the original description <strong>of</strong>two nominal species, C . ebriensis and C.dahomeyensis, observed that only the number <strong>of</strong>the dorsal and the anal fin rays can be indicated asbeing strikingly different. C . ebriensis had 70 - 73dorsal and 53 - 62 anal fin rays, while they were80 - 87 and 62 - 75 respectively in C.dahomeyensis. Teugels (1980) had alreadydemonstrated that the systematic value <strong>of</strong> thesecounts was doubtful because <strong>of</strong> their widevariation. It is worthy to observe that therejection <strong>of</strong> AFRC by Teugels (1980) based onwide variation may be invalid reasoning becauseall meristic counts examined by Teugels (1980) aswell as those examined in the present studyexhibited heterogeneous variance within stipulatedranges. Furthermore, species classification usingmorphological features is not based on one keycharacter but on a wide range <strong>of</strong> key characters.In C. angolensis, Sydenham (1978) recorded 70anal fin rays. Other numbers recorded for AFRCwere 46 - 53 in C. liberiensis = C. buettik<strong>of</strong>eri, 64 -66 in C. submarginatus = C. albopunctatus, 70 inC. laeviceps, 57 in C. walkeri = C. camerunensisand 63 – 71 in C. longior (Sydenham, 1978), 66 –73 in C. agboyiensis, 51 – 60 in C. isheriensis = C.agboyiensis and 59 to 62 in C. aboinenesis(Sydenham and Olawoye, 1981). The observedrange <strong>of</strong> the AFRC in all the species falls within theestablished range <strong>of</strong> 46 – 73 for the genus Clarias.Other authors have strongly supported thesystematic values <strong>of</strong> both AFRC and VC.Considering the use <strong>of</strong> meristic counts indifferentiating other fish species, the AFRC was amajor character in discriminating among Oryziasspecies (Uwa and Parenti, 1988). Similarly,Ferguson and Liskauskas (1995) employed bothAFRC and VC in discriminating among populations<strong>of</strong> the brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Thus, thepresent study further justifies the taxonomicimportance <strong>of</strong> AFRC and VC in differentiatingbetween clariids.REFERENCESEYO, J. E. (1997). Morphometric and cytogeneticvariations among Clarias species(Clariidae) in <strong>Anambra</strong> River, Nigeria.Ph.D. thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Nigeria,Nsukka. 267 pp.EYO, J. E. (2002a). Congeneric discrimination <strong>of</strong>morphometric characters among members<strong>of</strong> the Pisces Genus Clarias (Clariidae) in<strong>Anambra</strong> River, Nigeria. The <strong>Zoo</strong>logist ,Vol. 1 (1): (In Press).EYO, J. E. (2002b). Conspecific discriminationin ratio morphometric characters amongMembers <strong>of</strong> the Pisces Genus: ClariasScopoli, 1777. The <strong>Zoo</strong>logist, Vol. 1 (1):(in Press).EZENWAJI, H. M. G. (1989). Aspects <strong>of</strong> thebiology <strong>of</strong> some “small” Clarias species in<strong>Anambra</strong> river basin, Nigeria. Ph.D.thesis. University <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, Nsukka. 224pp.FERGUSON, M. M. and LISKAUSKAS, A. P. (1995).Heritability and evolution <strong>of</strong> meristicvariation in a naturalized population <strong>of</strong>brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis). NordicJournal <strong>of</strong> Freshwater Research, 71: 217 –228.LOWE-MCCONNELL, R. H. (1972). FreshwaterFishes <strong>of</strong> the Volta and Kainji lakes.Ghana University Press, Accra.SYDENHAM, D. H. J. (1978). Redescriptions <strong>of</strong> thetype specimen <strong>of</strong> six Clariid species(Pisces) <strong>from</strong> Western Africa. <strong>Zoo</strong>logicalJournal o f Linnean Society, 64: 347 - 371.SYDENHAM, D. H. J. (1980). New species <strong>of</strong>Clarias <strong>from</strong> West Africa. (Pisces,Clariidae). Revue <strong>Zoo</strong>logica africana,94(3 ): 659 - 677.SYDENHAM, D. H. J. 1983. A key to the genusClarias in Nigeria. Mimeograph <strong>of</strong> theDepartment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>logy, University <strong>of</strong>Ibadan, Nigeria. 2 pp.SYDENHAM, D. H. J. and OLAWOYE, O. F. (1981).A new species <strong>of</strong> Clarias <strong>from</strong> Nigeria(Pisces, Clariidae). Revue <strong>Zoo</strong>logicaafricana, 95(1): 234 - 241.TEUGELS, G. G. (1980). Notes on the status andthe synonyms <strong>of</strong> Clarias pachynemaBoulenger 1903 (Pisces, Clariidae). Revue<strong>Zoo</strong>logica africana, 94(3): 678 - 692.TEUGELS, G. G. (1982). Preliminary data <strong>of</strong> asystematic outline <strong>of</strong> the African species<strong>of</strong> the genus Clarias (Pisces, Clariidae).Revue <strong>Zoo</strong>logica africana, 96(1): 731 -748.TEUGELS, G. G. and THYS VAN DENAUDENAERDE, D. F. E. (1981). On thesynonym <strong>of</strong> the West African speciesClarias ebriensis and Clariasdahomeyensis (Pisces, Clariidae). Revue<strong>Zoo</strong>logica africana, 95(1): 11 - 28.UWA, H. and PARENTI, L. R. (1988).Morphometric and meristic variation inrice <strong>fishes</strong>, genus Oryzias: a comparisonwith cytogenetic data. Japan Journal <strong>of</strong>Ichthyology, 35(2): 159 – 166.
Animal Research International (2004) 1(1): 36 – 41 36MAYR’S COEFFICIENT OF DIFFERENCE AND TAXONOMY OF CLARIAS(CLARIIDAE – SCOPOLI, 1777)EYO, Joseph Effiong and INYANG, Nicholas MathiasDepartment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>logy, University <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, Nsukka. Enugu State, Nigeria.Corresponding author: EYO, Joseph Effiong, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zoo</strong>logy, University <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, Nsukka.Enugu State, Nigeria. Email: divinelovejoe@yahoo.comABSTRACTCoefficient <strong>of</strong> difference in 54 morphometric characters was studied using 258 Clariasspecies <strong>from</strong> <strong>Anambra</strong> river, Nigeria. There were no differences between C. ebriensis andC. albopunctatus for all the 54 characters studied. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> difference inmorphometric characters <strong>of</strong> C. ebriensis vs. C. gariepinus indicated that about 90 % <strong>of</strong> C.ebriensis were significantly different <strong>from</strong> about 90 % <strong>of</strong> C. gariepinus in about 34morphometric characters. Thirty seven differentiating morphometric characters occurredbetween C. ebriensis and C. anguillaris. Considering the discriminating charactersbetween C. albopunctatus and C. gariepinus, 90 % <strong>of</strong> C. albopunctatus differed <strong>from</strong> 90% <strong>of</strong> C. gariepinus in about 32 characters. Furthermore, about 90 % <strong>of</strong> C. albopunctatusdiffered <strong>from</strong> 90 % <strong>of</strong> C. anguillaris in about 35 characters. Differentiating <strong>of</strong> C.gariepinus <strong>from</strong> C. anguillaris based on the coefficient <strong>of</strong> difference was impossible for allthe 54 characters studied. The coefficients <strong>of</strong> difference among all clariids studied werealmost identical in 10 characters namely: maximum body depth, pectoral spine height,anal fin base length, inner mandibular barbe l length, outer mandibular barbel length,maxillary barbel length, premaxillary teeth band depth, vomerine teeth band depth,prenasal length and nasal - nasal barbel space, with exception <strong>of</strong> C. ebriensis vs. C.albopunctatus and C. gariepinus vs. C. anguillaris. These characters thus represent “keycharacters” for differentiating between the “small” and “large” clariids.Key words: Mayr’s Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Difference, Clarias, Clariidae, TaxonomyINTRODUCTIONDifferences in fifty-four morphometriccharacters among four Clarias species Scopoli,1777 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Anambra</strong> river, Nigeria, using F-LSDhave been reported (Eyo, 2002 a, b). In thereport, Clarias albopunctatus and C. ebriensis aswell as C. anguillaris and C. gariepinus wereshown to have overlapping morphometriccharacter ranges. Differences among thestudied Clarias species occurred in 2 raw(pectoral fin base length (PFBL) and frontalfontanel width (FFW)), 9 ratio (pelvic fin baselength (PeFBL), pectoral spine height (PSH),dorsal fin height (DFH), maxillary teeth bandwidth (MTBW), premaxillary teeth band depth(PmTBD), frontal fontenelle length (FFL),internasal space (INS), pelvic fin – anal finspace (PeAS) and prenasal barbel length(PNBL)) and not easily established in 6 residual(Total length (TOL), prepectoral length (PPL),pectoral fin base length (PFBL), Dorsal fin baselength (DFBL), outer mandibular barbel space(OMBS) and eye diameter (EDIA))morphometric characters. The 2 raw and 9ratio characters were recommended asimportant generic and specific key characters inclariid systematics and their ecological andtaxonomic implications were reassessed (Eyo,2002 a).Similarly, sex differentiatingmorphometric characters between male andfemale clariids inhabiting the <strong>Anambra</strong> riversystems employing studentized t -test occurredin 7, 11, 20 and 26 morphometric characters forClarias ebriensis, C. albopuncatus, C . gariepinusand C. anguillaris respectively.Furthermore, specific differences in thedistribution <strong>of</strong> meristic character among theclariids <strong>of</strong> <strong>Anambra</strong> river, Nigeria, utilizing F-LSD, indicated that both the anal fin ray andvertebrae counts were <strong>of</strong> taxonomic importance.There was a close numerical <strong>relationship</strong>between the number <strong>of</strong> anal fin rays andnumber <strong>of</strong> vertebrae (Eyo, 2004).Another univariate statistical toolcapable <strong>of</strong> discriminating 90 % population <strong>of</strong>species A <strong>from</strong> 90 % population <strong>of</strong> species B isMayr’s coefficient <strong>of</strong> difference (CD) (Mayr,1969). Thus in the present study, Mayr’s
- Page 2 and 3: Animal ResearchInternational ®Anim
- Page 4 and 5: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 6 and 7: Length-weight relationships of fish
- Page 9 and 10: EZENWAJI, Henry Maduka Godfrey 6sta
- Page 11 and 12: NGWU, Godwin Ikechukwu et al.8Studi
- Page 13 and 14: NGWU, Godwin Ikechukwu et al.betwee
- Page 15 and 16: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 17 and 18: Metal concentrations in Alau reserv
- Page 19 and 20: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 21 and 22: Oxygen consumption rate of crab18Ef
- Page 23 and 24: Oxygen consumption rate of crab20O
- Page 25 and 26: Oxygen consumption rate of crab22MA
- Page 27 and 28: UBACHUKWU, Patience Obiageli24group
- Page 29: UBACHUKWU, Patience Obiageli26Table
- Page 32 and 33: Perception and treatment of onchoce
- Page 34 and 35: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 36 and 37: Differences in meristic counts of t
- Page 40 and 41: EYO, Joseph Effiong and INYANG, Nic
- Page 42 and 43: EYO, Joseph Effiong and INYANG, Nic
- Page 44 and 45: EYO, Joseph Effiong and INYANG, Nic
- Page 46 and 47: OSAKWE, Isaac, Ikechukwu and STEING
- Page 48 and 49: OSAKWE, Isaac, Ikechukwu and STEING
- Page 50 and 51: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 52 and 53: Oviposition, fecundity and developm
- Page 54 and 55: Oviposition, fecundity and developm
- Page 56 and 57: OLUAH, Ndubuisi Stanley and MGBENKA
- Page 58 and 59: OLUAH, Ndubuisi Stanley and MGBENKA
- Page 60 and 61: Animal Research International (2004
- Page 62 and 63: Community participation in the cont
- Page 64 and 65: Community participation in the cont
- Page 66 and 67: Community participation in the cont
- Page 68 and 69: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam et al.6
- Page 70 and 71: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam et al.6
- Page 72 and 73: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam et al.6