11.07.2015 Views

Deeper_Dive_into_Afterschool

Deeper_Dive_into_Afterschool

Deeper_Dive_into_Afterschool

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Other practices included in some, but not all, assessment tools related to connections tocommunity and families, staffing issues, such as staff quality and staff-to-student ratios, youthleadership and participation, and program management.The question has been raised of whether programs will be able to improve their quality if acommitment to ongoing program assessment is not made. 88 In an article offeringrecommendations to help the afterschool field continue to make progress in supporting studentsuccess, the authors advocated for investment in designing tools to measure program quality;implementation and testing of those tools; and funding dedicated to support staff, programs,and the infrastructure and research necessary for continuous improvement efforts. 89ClosingThe above practices are a synthesis of the research on the characteristics that embody qualityafterschool programs. However, in line with the discussion of program evaluation andimprovement, the ability of afterschool programs to carry out each practice satisfactorily is anongoing and iterative process. As stated by researcher Robert Granger, “In the afterschoolfield, it is tempting to characterize a program asbeing of high or of low quality…it is more appropriateto consider quality as something that varies within aprogram, with many programs…being more effectivein one area than another.” 90 Moving forward, armingthe afterschool field with additional information onpromising practices—what they are, how to adoptthem and most importantly how to implementthem—is a necessary endeavor to help ensure thatthe children in afterschool programs are receivingthe best supports and care available. To betterunderstand how effective afterschool programs areimplementing promising practices, Section III takesthe individual programs discussed in Section I andprovides a detailed look at how they each carry outpromising practices.“Building an effort to improvethe quality of existing programsmeans investing in developingstandards and benchmarks thatemphasize capacity building atthe systems level….we know thatthis capacity building mustinclude evaluation, professionaldevelopment, and strategies forcompensation.”— Heather Weiss, director, HarvardFamily Research Project23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!