11.07.2015 Views

Volume IV, Issue II (April 2006) - Columbus School of Law

Volume IV, Issue II (April 2006) - Columbus School of Law

Volume IV, Issue II (April 2006) - Columbus School of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Due to the number <strong>of</strong> Americans and <strong>of</strong> American charities investing in securities markets, 543there needs to be as much protection for them as possible to prevent misconduct. While theprimary burden for protecting investors rests on the SEC, tax laws could be an important source<strong>of</strong> aid. The current tax law is seriously flawed in that it provides a considerable motivation fortaxpayers to retain brokers rather than investment advisors to manage their investment accounts.Brokers are required to meet a level <strong>of</strong> fiduciary duty that is significantly lower than that <strong>of</strong>investment advisors, yet brokerage fees are granted preferential tax treatment. At a minimum, theIRC should be modified to treat investment advisory fees and brokerage fees equally as properadjustments to basis. A better alternative would be to amend the IRC to grant preferable taxtreatment for investment advisory fees. Investors deserve investment pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who are heldto a high level <strong>of</strong> fiduciary duty; Congress should revise the tax laws with this in mind.543 See Wilkins, supra note 2.90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!