Top-Down vs. Bottom Up: Working Towards Consensus ... - CASIOPA

Recommendations

Info

WORKSHOP SPONSORS:Canadian Council on Ecological AreasEnvironment CanadaNature Conservancy CanadaOntario ParksParks CanadaParks Research Forum of OntarioUniversity of GuelphUniversity of WaterlooPUBLICATION OF PARKS RESEARCH FORUM OF ONTARIO (PRFO)Contact:E.S.1, Room 356, University of WaterlooWaterloo, ON N2L 3G1Phone: 519-888-4567 ext. 32072Fax: 519-746-2031Web: http://www.environment.uwaterloo.ca/research/prfo/FRONT COVER:Map of Ontario's National Parks, National Marine Conservation Areas, Provincial Parks andConservation Reserves. National Parks and National Marine Conservation Areas are shown in darkgreen, Provincial Parks are shown in lighter green, and Conservation Reserves are shown in purple.Map provided courtesy of Ontario Parks.LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATIONState of the Art Protected Areas Design Workshop (2006 : Guelph, Ont.)<strong>Top</strong>-down <strong>vs</strong>. bottom up : working towards consensus on systematic protected areas planning inOntario : summary of the Parks Research Forum of Ontario (PRFO) State of the Art Protected AreasDesign Workshop, Guelph, ON, March 9-10, 2006 / editors: Yolanda F. Wiersma & Thomas D.Nudds ; contributors: Kristyn Ferguson ... [et al].Includes bibliographical references.ISBN 978-0-9737544-6-91. Parks--Ontario--Planning--Congresses. 2. Protected areas--Ontario--Planning--Congresses.3. Parks--Ontario--Congresses. 4. Protected areas--Ontario--Congresses. I. Wiersma, Yolanda F.(Yolanda Francine), 1973- II. Nudds, Thomas David, 1952- III. Ferguson, Kristyn, 1982- IV. ParksResearch Forum of Ontario V. Title.QH77.C3S695 2006 333.78'309713 C2008-905855-0© Parks Research Forum of Ontarioii | P a g e
SUMMARY OF THE PARKS RESEARCH FORUM OF ONTARIO (PRFO)STATE OF THE ART PROTECTED AREAS DESIGN WORKSHOP, 2006Table of ContentsIntroduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1Methods ............................................................................................................................................................. 4Results and Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 6Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................... 15References and Further Reading ..................................................................................................................... 17Appendices ...................................................................................................................................................... 21List of Boxes, Tables & FiguresBox 1. Workshop Goals .................................................................................................................................... 1Table 1. Framework for developing a representative protected areas network ............................................ 10Table 2. General recommendations for “Data Requirements & Issues” at multiple scales ............................ 12Table 3. Evaluation of the degree to which sites selected follow refined “Pressey Steps” ........................... 13Figure 1. Results of Day 2 exercise: groups‟ selections of priority areas for new protected areas ............... 14Figure 2. Pressey‟s model for deciding relative emphasis on three aspects of protected area design ........... 50Box 2. Steps in Conservation Planning - “Pressey Steps” ............................................................................... 52Table 4. Augmented “Pressey Steps” with case study rankings .................................................................... 74Figure 3. Map of the ecozones, ecoregions and ecodistricts of Ontario ........................................................ 91Figure 4. Map showing data sources for best available landform data sets in Ontario ................................. 92Figure 5. Map showing best available vegetation data sets in Ontario .......................................................... 93Figure 6. Landform classification for Ontario ............................................................................................... 94Figure 7. Vegetation classification for Ontario .............................................................................................. 95Figure 8. Under-represented features based on the L/V GapTools approach for all of Ontario .................... 96
Page 3: Top-Down vs. Bottom Up?Working Towa
Page 8 and 9: TOP-DOWN VS. BOTTOM UP? WORKING TOW
Page 13 and 14: SUMMARY OF THE PARKS RESEARCH FORUM
Page 22: TOP-DOWN VS. BOTTOM UP? WORKING TOW
Page 55 and 56:
SUMMARY OF THE PARKS RESEARCH FORUM
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
show all

Top-Down vs. Bottom Up: Working Towards Consensus ... - CASIOPA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?