Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...
Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...
Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C H A P T E R 7 <strong>Latent</strong> <strong>Print</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
et al., 2004, p 128; Almog, 2001, pp 177–209; Pounds et<br />
al., 1990, pp 169–175; Didierjean et al., 1998, pp 163–167),<br />
applying a 160 °C iron for 20–30 seconds (Stoilovic, 1993,<br />
pp 141–153), or applying a 180 °C ironing press for 10<br />
seconds (Almog, 2001, pp 177–209; Stoilovic, 1993, pp<br />
141–153). The reaction must be carried out in a dry environment<br />
with low humidity because moisture interferes with<br />
the development reaction (Champod et al., 2004, p 129;<br />
Almog, 2001, pp 177–209; Wilkinson, 2000a, pp 87–103).<br />
After DFO application and heating, developed fingerprints<br />
can be observed using 530 nm excitation light and a 590<br />
nm barrier filter, or 555 nm excitation light and a 610 nm<br />
barrier filter (Almog, 2001, pp 177–209). The exhibit may<br />
then be treated with ninhydrin as previously described.<br />
7.6 1,2-Indanedione<br />
7.6.1 History<br />
The fingerprint-developing capabilities of 1,2-indanedione<br />
were first considered after a related compound, 6-methylthio-1,2-indanedione,<br />
was found to produce fluorescent<br />
fingerprints (Hauze et al., 1998, pp 744–747). This prompted<br />
researchers to synthesize the parent compound and several<br />
other analogues and to evaluate their utility as fingerprint<br />
reagents (Ramotowski et al., 1997, pp 131–139). The results<br />
were similar to DFO in that a faint, pink-colored product<br />
was produced that fluoresced brightly at room temperature<br />
(Ramotowski et al., 1997, pp 131–139). Further research<br />
indicated that these reagents are more sensitive than<br />
other current methods and, because of the ease of synthesis,<br />
can be a cheaper alternative (Cava et al., 1958, pp<br />
2257–2263; Dayan et al., 1998, pp 2752–2754; Joullié and<br />
Petrovskaia, 1998, pp 41–44). In the eight years following<br />
7–20<br />
FIGURE 7–7<br />
DFO-developed fingerprint.<br />
Left, under ambient light.<br />
Right, excited by a<br />
forensic light source<br />
and viewed through the<br />
proper viewing filter.<br />
these discoveries, 1,2-indanedione has become a standard<br />
reagent in Israeli laboratories and has been investigated for<br />
use in many other countries (Almog, 2001, pp 177–209).<br />
7.6.2 Theory<br />
1,2-Indanedione is a close analogue of ninhydrin and is<br />
theorized to react with amino acids in a very similar fashion<br />
(Petrovskaia et al., 2001, pp 7666–7675). The structure of<br />
1,2-indanedione has been characterized (Wilkinson, 2000b,<br />
pp 123–132) and is illustrated in Figure 7–8(A).<br />
Mechanistic studies of 1,2-indanedione’s reaction with<br />
amino acids have indicated that the presence of methanol<br />
desensitizes the reagent (Wilkinson, 2000b, pp 123–132).<br />
Like DFO, indanedione forms a hemiketal with methanol;<br />
however, unlike DFO, this hemiketal is more stable than<br />
the parent compound and thus its formation prevents<br />
the reaction with amino acids. Because 1,2-indanedione<br />
is completely converted to the less sensitive hemiketal<br />
(Wilkinson, 2000b, pp 123–132), some suggest that<br />
alcohols should be avoided in any indanedione formulations<br />
(Wilkinson et al., 2005; Wiesner et al., 2001, pp<br />
1082–1084). Other studies have not corroborated this lack<br />
of sensitivity in methanolic solution (Roux et al., 2000, pp<br />
761–769). Similar ambiguity exists on the addition of acetic<br />
acid (Lennard et al., 2005, p 43); some authors have found<br />
that a small amount of acetic acid improves the results<br />
(Hauze et al., 1998, pp 744–747; Joullié and Petrovskaia,<br />
1998, pp 41–44), whereas others have experienced blurry,<br />
unclear fingerprints when using acidified solutions (Almog,<br />
2001, pp 177–209; Wiesner et al., 2001, pp 1082–1084;<br />
Kasper et al., 2002). These discrepancies have been linked<br />
to the acid content of the paper produced in the authors’<br />
various countries (Wilkinson et al., 2005).