23.11.2012 Views

Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...

Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...

Latent Print Development - National Criminal Justice Reference ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Various techniques, such as the use of very fine powder or<br />

flexible lifting media, may be used to reduce the problems<br />

caused by textured surfaces (Guerrero, 1992; Kelly et al.,<br />

2001, pp 7–12; Knaap and Adach, 2002, pp 561–571).<br />

7.1.4 Process Selection<br />

Fingerprint reagents and development techniques are gen-<br />

erally intended to be used in combination and sequential<br />

order. These methods are often specific to either porous<br />

or nonporous substrates; however, some techniques have<br />

universal applications. Deviation from the recommended<br />

order could render subsequent processes ineffective.<br />

Refer to Trozzi et al. (2000), Kent (1998), and Champod<br />

et al. (2004, pp 217–225) for examples of guidelines for<br />

sequential ordering, and to Champod et al. (2004, pp<br />

105–179) for a recent review that includes many fingerprint<br />

development techniques. The following general procedures<br />

are appropriate during a systematic search for latent finger-<br />

print evidence:<br />

• Visual inspection with a bright light, forensic light<br />

source, or laser<br />

• Sequential latent print processing<br />

• Documentation of developed prints at each step<br />

It is important to note that not all processes are used<br />

invariably. Some discretion will remain with individual agen-<br />

cies and practitioners both at the crime scene and in the<br />

laboratory. The following factors may influence the choice<br />

of development techniques as well as the level of resourc-<br />

es used in any situation:<br />

• Type of latent print residue suspected<br />

• Type of substrate<br />

• Texture of substrate<br />

• Condition of substrate (clean, dirty, tacky, sticky,<br />

greasy, etc.)<br />

• Environmental conditions during and following latent<br />

print deposition<br />

• Length of time since evidence was touched<br />

• Consequences of destructive processing methods<br />

• Subsequent forensic examinations<br />

• Sequential ordering of reagents<br />

• Seriousness of the crime<br />

7.1.5 Evidence Handling<br />

Proper evidence handling begins with the use of latex,<br />

nitrile, PVC, or other suitable gloves. Some glove manufac-<br />

turers or safety supply distributors will list gloves recom-<br />

mended for use with various chemicals. The use of gloves<br />

protects the evidence from contamination and the user<br />

from exposure to pathogens or hazardous chemicals. It<br />

does not, however, guarantee that latent prints will be pre-<br />

served because even a gloved hand may destroy fragile la-<br />

tent prints on contact. This is especially true on nonporous<br />

surfaces where the latent print resides on the extreme<br />

surface of the evidence. To prevent damage to fingerprints<br />

on these surfaces, evidence should be handled in areas not<br />

normally touched or on surfaces incapable of yielding viable<br />

fingerprints. It should also be noted that the use of gloves<br />

does not preclude the transfer of friction ridge detail from<br />

the examiner to the exhibit (Willinski, 1980, pp 682–685;<br />

St-Amand, 1994, pp 11–13; Hall, 1991, pp 415–416).<br />

7.1.6 Packaging<br />

<strong>Latent</strong> <strong>Print</strong> <strong>Development</strong> C H A P T E R 7<br />

Packaging helps ensure the integrity of the evidence by<br />

keeping contaminants away, keeping trace evidence intact,<br />

and helping to guarantee chain of custody. Cardboard<br />

boxes, paper bags, and plastic bags are the most common<br />

forms of evidence packaging. Most experts recommend<br />

paper packaging because it is breathable and cost effective,<br />

although plastic bags are also widely used. Any items that<br />

have been wet should be allowed to air-dry prior to packag-<br />

ing because excess moisture trapped in any package will<br />

increase the probability of destructive fungal growth. Mois-<br />

ture can also be trapped in plastic bags when evidence is<br />

gathered in high-humidity environments.<br />

Items of nonporous evidence should not be allowed to rub<br />

together. Nonporous evidence should be stored singly,<br />

secured inside an appropriately sized package in a manner<br />

that prevents shifting and rubbing. Under no circumstances<br />

should fillers such as shredded paper, wood shavings,<br />

or packing peanuts be used inside the package with the<br />

evidence because they may easily wipe off fragile finger-<br />

prints. (However, they can be used outside the evidence<br />

container, inside the mailing container.) Porous evidence<br />

can be secured in boxes, bags, and envelopes and can<br />

be stored together because latent prints are not likely to<br />

7–5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!