Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sydney Law School Research Paper No 12/26. Available atSSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2041680 [or: OUP 2012 Chapterversion in L Trakman et al (eds)].74. The Alcohol Law Reform Bill 2010 236–2 (NZ). The LawCommission Report Alcohol In Our Lives: Curbing the HarmNZLC R114 27 April 2010 available at www.lawcom.govt.nz.310australian product liability reporter October 2012
INDEX TO VOLUME 22Table of articlesPage numbers in volume 22 correspond to thefollowing issues:Issue 1&2 — pp 153–76Issue 3 — pp 177–92Issue 4 — pp 193–212Issue 5 — pp 213–28Issue 6 — pp 229–44Issue 7 — pp 245–58Issue 8 — pp 259–78Issue 9 — pp 279–94Issue 10 — pp 295–319This table lists alphabetically by author all articlesappearing in volume 22 of the Australian ProductLiability Reporter.Abraham, Richard and Cook, LarissaThe introduction of the Australian Biologicals RegulatoryFramework — 178Bertrand,Perrine;Freeman,Rod;andKenyon,ValerieEuropean Commission’s fourth report on the ProductLiability Directive: still maintaining the balance betweenthe interests of producers and consumers — 204Brown, Ryan CTexas appellate court stabilises “presumption of noliability” jury instruction in products cases — 254Chiaves, Filippo and Rolla, FrancescaItaly: smokers’class action declared non-admissible — 162Cook, Larissa and Abraham, RichardThe introduction of the Australian Biologicals RegulatoryFramework — 178Cooper, MontyPassing the smell test: Twombly, Iqbal, and a CaliforniaFederal Court’s requirement of more specificity in complaintagainst defendants — 288De Campo, Ben and Maxwell, MichaelNanoparticles:Dealingwiththeshiftingsandsofscience — 246Doris, MartinDeveloping consumer ODR in the European Union — amodel to imitate? — 280Fleming, MarcusNew primary production and processing standard foreggs and egg products — 168Forbes, Roger; Hackney, Beth; Stevenson,Peta; and Saville, MoiraHips and PIPs — a future for product liability classactions in Australia? — 230Fraser, Melissa and Zaurrini, RossEarlier rather than later: court orders ACCC to discloseimmunity applicant’s information to other cartel participantsat early stage of cartel proceedings — 200Freeman, Rod and Hunting, MarkExpert witness fails to impress in car tyre case — 207Freeman,Rod;Kenyon,Valerie;andBertrand,PerrineEuropean Commission’s fourth report on the ProductLiability Directive: still maintaining the balance betweenthe interests of producers and consumers — 204Goldberg, Michael and Melnitchouk, OlyaNew toy safety regulations come into play in theUK — 197Goldberg, Michael and Pearl, SimonUS Supreme Court ruling provides clarification onjurisdiction over foreign manufacturers — 164Guadagno, Nadia; O’Donahoo, Peter; andKinsey, DanielHigh Court denies special leave in Vioxx litigation — 264Hackney,Beth;Stevenson,Peta;Saville,Moira;and Forbes, RogerHips and PIPs — a future for product liability classactions in Australia? — 230Hammerschlag, Judith and Skinner, MatthewProduct liability in Singapore — an overview — 249australian product liability reporter October 2012 311
Page 1 and 2: 2012 . Vol 22 No 10Contentspage 296
Page 3 and 4: The hottest legal topic today is th
Page 5 and 6: Canadian case law: Arora et al v Wh
Page 7 and 8: australian product liability report
Page 9 and 10: Contracts Act 1981 and the Hire Pur
Page 11 and 12: • A prohibition on unsolicited di
Page 13 and 14: The Bill aims to improve the accura
Page 15: 45. Cabinet Economic Growth and Inf
Page 19 and 20: Rolla, Francesca and Chiaves, Filip
Page 21 and 22: McGhee v National Coal Board [1973]
Page 23 and 24: New South WalesCivil Liability Act
Page 25 and 26: Hire Purchase Act 1971 — 302KiwiS
Page 27 and 28: australian product liability report

Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?