Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...
Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...
Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table of <strong>case</strong>sThis table lists <strong>al</strong>phab<strong>et</strong>ic<strong>al</strong>ly <strong>al</strong>l <strong>case</strong>s appearing involume 22 of the Austr<strong>al</strong>ian Product Liability Reporter.Page numbers in bold refer to articles focusing on therelevant <strong>case</strong>.ACCC. See Austr<strong>al</strong>ian Comp<strong>et</strong>ition <strong>and</strong> ConsumerCommissionActos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation,Re, MDL 2299 (WDLa) — 296Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW administered windingup) v Booth (2011) 283 ALR 461; 86 ALJR 172; [2011]HCA 53; BC201109716 — 239, 247–48, 265Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis (2010) 240 CLR 111; 263 ALR576; 84ALJR 226; [2010] HCA5; BC201000970 — 235,247–48, 265Amchem Products Inc v Windsor; sub nom (1997)521 US 591; 138 L Ed 689; 117 S Ct 2231; 65 USLW4635 — 215, 217American Optic<strong>al</strong> Corp v Spiewak, Case Nos SC08-1616 <strong>and</strong> SC08-1640 (Fla, decided 8 July 2011) — 174Aquagenics Pty Ltd v Break O’Day Council (2010)26 BCL 263; [2010] TASFC 3; BC201002872 — 194<strong>Arora</strong> v<strong>Whirlpool</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>LP</strong> 2012 ONSC 2642 — 299Asahi M<strong>et</strong><strong>al</strong> Industry Co Ltd v Superior Court ofC<strong>al</strong>ifornia 480 US 102 (1987) — 164–65, 173Ashcroft v Iqb<strong>al</strong>, 556 US 662 (2009) — 174, 288–89ASIC. See Austr<strong>al</strong>ian Securities <strong>and</strong> InvestmentsCommissionAswan Engineering Establishment Co v LupidineLtd [1987] 1 WLR 1 — 268Austr<strong>al</strong>ian Comp<strong>et</strong>ition <strong>and</strong> Consumer Commissionv Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia SRL [2011] FCA938; BC201106278 — 200–03Austr<strong>al</strong>ian Securities <strong>and</strong> Investments Commission vPDawson[2008]FCAFC123;(2008)169FCR227 — 201B1 (Contracting) Pty Ltd v Strikwerda 2005) 3DDCR 149; [2005] NSWCA288; BC200506703 — 226Barker v Corus [2006] 2 AC 572; [2006] 3 All ER 785;[2006] 2 WLR 1027 — 265Barwin v IKO Industries [2012] OJ No 3332 — 300BellAtlanticCorpvTwombly550US544(2007) — 174,288–89Blackmore v Polaris Indus Inc, Case No 10-00631(US Dist Ct, D Colo, filed 21 July 2011) — 175Bondy v Toshiba <strong>Canada</strong> Ltd [2007] OJ No 784 — 300BS Brown & Son Ltd v Craiks Ltd [1970] 1 All ER823; [1970] 1 WLR 752 — 268<strong>Canadian</strong> Nation<strong>al</strong> Railway Co v Norsk Pacific SteamshipCo [1992] 1 SCR 1021 — 299Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605;(1990) 1 ACSR 636; [1990] 1 All ER 568; [1990] 2WLR 358 — 253, 274Casey v Perini Corporation, 206 C<strong>al</strong> App 4th 1222(2012) — 291–92Ch<strong>and</strong>lerv Cape PLC [2012] EWCACiv 525 — 274–75Ch<strong>and</strong>ra v Perp<strong>et</strong>u<strong>al</strong> Trustees Victoria Ltd (2007)ANZ ConvR 481; 13 BPR 24,675; [2007] NSWSC 694;BC200705487 — 194Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232; 156 ALR 517; 72ALJR 1344; BC9804342 — 235Codacons v British American Tobacco It<strong>al</strong>ia SpA,Court of Rome, XIII Division (11April 2011) — 162–63Conley v Gibson, 355 US 41 (1957) — 288Connelly v RTZ Corporation PLC, HL 1997 — 274De Cruz Andrea Heidi v Guangzhou Yuzhitang He<strong>al</strong>thProducts Co Ltd [2003] SGHC 229; [2003] 4 SLR682 — 252DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc ASR Hip Implant ProductsLiability Litigation, Re, MDL 2197 (NDOh) — 296Divya v Toyo Tire <strong>and</strong> Rubber Co Ltd [2011] EWHC1993 (QB) — 207–09Evans v Queanbeyan City Council (2011) 9 DDCR541; [2011] NSWCA 230; BC201105860 — 235,239Fairchild v Glenhaven Funer<strong>al</strong> Services Ltd [2003] 1AC 32; [2002] 3 All ER 305; [2002] 3 WLR 89 — 265Fontenot v TASER Int’l Inc, Case No 3:10-125 (USDist Ct, WDNC, verdict reached 19 July 2011) — 174–75Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products LiabilityLitigation, Re, MDL 2243 (No II) (DNJ) — 296Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, SA v Brown,Case No 10-76 (US Supreme Court) — 164–65, 173Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2000) 109LGERA 1; 177 ALR 18; [2000] FCA 1099;BC200004491 — 268Griffin v Dell <strong>Canada</strong> Inc; Gariepy v Shell Oil Co[2002] OJ No 2766 — 300Gunnersen v Henwood [2011] VSC 440;BC201106864 — 194–95Hamid v Lexus, 2011 WL 7074213 (Tex App —Houston [1 Dist]) — 254–55Henry Kend<strong>al</strong>l & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd;Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultur<strong>al</strong> [1969]2 AC 31; [1968] 2 All ER 444; [1968] 3 WLR 110;[1968] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 547 — 268HSD Co Pty Ltd v Masu Financi<strong>al</strong> Management PtyLtd [2008] NSWSC 1279; BC200810786 — 195J McIntyre Machinery Ltd v Nicastro US SupremeCourt, Case No 09-1343, 27 June 2011 — 159–61,164–65, 173Koh v S C Johnson & Son Inc, Case No 09-00927 (USDist Ct, ND C<strong>al</strong>) — 175Lym Internation<strong>al</strong> Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011]NSWCA 303; BC201107351 — 196Martel Building Ltd v <strong>Canada</strong> [2000] 2 SCR 860 — 299314austr<strong>al</strong>ian product liability reporter October 2012
Change language