Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table of casesThis table lists alphabetically all cases appearing involume 22 of the Australian Product Liability Reporter.Page numbers in bold refer to articles focusing on therelevant case.ACCC. See Australian Competition and ConsumerCommissionActos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation,Re, MDL 2299 (WDLa) — 296Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW administered windingup) v Booth (2011) 283 ALR 461; 86 ALJR 172; [2011]HCA 53; BC201109716 — 239, 247–48, 265Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis (2010) 240 CLR 111; 263 ALR576; 84ALJR 226; [2010] HCA5; BC201000970 — 235,247–48, 265Amchem Products Inc v Windsor; sub nom (1997)521 US 591; 138 L Ed 689; 117 S Ct 2231; 65 USLW4635 — 215, 217American Optical Corp v Spiewak, Case Nos SC08-1616 and SC08-1640 (Fla, decided 8 July 2011) — 174Aquagenics Pty Ltd v Break O’Day Council (2010)26 BCL 263; [2010] TASFC 3; BC201002872 — 194Arora vWhirlpool Canada LP 2012 ONSC 2642 — 299Asahi Metal Industry Co Ltd v Superior Court ofCalifornia 480 US 102 (1987) — 164–65, 173Ashcroft v Iqbal, 556 US 662 (2009) — 174, 288–89ASIC. See Australian Securities and InvestmentsCommissionAswan Engineering Establishment Co v LupidineLtd [1987] 1 WLR 1 — 268Australian Competition and Consumer Commissionv Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia SRL [2011] FCA938; BC201106278 — 200–03Australian Securities and Investments Commission vPDawson[2008]FCAFC123;(2008)169FCR227 — 201B1 (Contracting) Pty Ltd v Strikwerda 2005) 3DDCR 149; [2005] NSWCA288; BC200506703 — 226Barker v Corus [2006] 2 AC 572; [2006] 3 All ER 785;[2006] 2 WLR 1027 — 265Barwin v IKO Industries [2012] OJ No 3332 — 300BellAtlanticCorpvTwombly550US544(2007) — 174,288–89Blackmore v Polaris Indus Inc, Case No 10-00631(US Dist Ct, D Colo, filed 21 July 2011) — 175Bondy v Toshiba Canada Ltd [2007] OJ No 784 — 300BS Brown & Son Ltd v Craiks Ltd [1970] 1 All ER823; [1970] 1 WLR 752 — 268Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific SteamshipCo [1992] 1 SCR 1021 — 299Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605;(1990) 1 ACSR 636; [1990] 1 All ER 568; [1990] 2WLR 358 — 253, 274Casey v Perini Corporation, 206 Cal App 4th 1222(2012) — 291–92Chandlerv Cape PLC [2012] EWCACiv 525 — 274–75Chandra v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd (2007)ANZ ConvR 481; 13 BPR 24,675; [2007] NSWSC 694;BC200705487 — 194Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232; 156 ALR 517; 72ALJR 1344; BC9804342 — 235Codacons v British American Tobacco Italia SpA,Court of Rome, XIII Division (11April 2011) — 162–63Conley v Gibson, 355 US 41 (1957) — 288Connelly v RTZ Corporation PLC, HL 1997 — 274De Cruz Andrea Heidi v Guangzhou Yuzhitang HealthProducts Co Ltd [2003] SGHC 229; [2003] 4 SLR682 — 252DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc ASR Hip Implant ProductsLiability Litigation, Re, MDL 2197 (NDOh) — 296Divya v Toyo Tire and Rubber Co Ltd [2011] EWHC1993 (QB) — 207–09Evans v Queanbeyan City Council (2011) 9 DDCR541; [2011] NSWCA 230; BC201105860 — 235,239Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1AC 32; [2002] 3 All ER 305; [2002] 3 WLR 89 — 265Fontenot v TASER Int’l Inc, Case No 3:10-125 (USDist Ct, WDNC, verdict reached 19 July 2011) — 174–75Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products LiabilityLitigation, Re, MDL 2243 (No II) (DNJ) — 296Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, SA v Brown,Case No 10-76 (US Supreme Court) — 164–65, 173Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2000) 109LGERA 1; 177 ALR 18; [2000] FCA 1099;BC200004491 — 268Griffin v Dell Canada Inc; Gariepy v Shell Oil Co[2002] OJ No 2766 — 300Gunnersen v Henwood [2011] VSC 440;BC201106864 — 194–95Hamid v Lexus, 2011 WL 7074213 (Tex App —Houston [1 Dist]) — 254–55Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd;Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural [1969]2 AC 31; [1968] 2 All ER 444; [1968] 3 WLR 110;[1968] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 547 — 268HSD Co Pty Ltd v Masu Financial Management PtyLtd [2008] NSWSC 1279; BC200810786 — 195J McIntyre Machinery Ltd v Nicastro US SupremeCourt, Case No 09-1343, 27 June 2011 — 159–61,164–65, 173Koh v S C Johnson & Son Inc, Case No 09-00927 (USDist Ct, ND Cal) — 175Lym International Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011]NSWCA 303; BC201107351 — 196Martel Building Ltd v Canada [2000] 2 SCR 860 — 299314australian product liability reporter October 2012
McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] SC 37; [1972]3 All ER 1008; [1973] 1 WLR 1 — 265Medtel Pty Ltd v Courtney (2003) 198 ALR 630;(1991)ATPR41-939;[2003]FCAFC151;BC200303598 — 268Medtronic, Inc, Sprint Fidelis Lead Wire, Re, MDLNo 1905 (DMinn) — 216Medtronic, Inc, Sprint Fidelis Leads Products LiabilityLitigation, Re, 623 F3d 1200 — 216Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Peterson(2011) 196 FCR 145; 284 ALR 1; [2011] FCAFC 128;BC201107861 — 233, 234–39, 264–65Milward v Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc, 639F3d 11 (1st Cir 2011) — 297Muskoka Fuels v Hassan Steel Fabricators Ltd, 2009CanLII 63125 (ON SC) — 182–83Muskoka Fuels v Hassan Steel Fabricators Ltd, 2011ONCA 355 (CanLII) — 182–83Nelson v Matrixx Initiatives, Inc, No C 09-02904 (NDCal May 18, 2012) — 288–90Northern Securities Co v United States, 193 US 197(1904) — 154Ortiz v Fibreboard Corp; sub nom (1999) 527 US815; 144 L Ed 2d 715; 119 S Ct 2295; 67 USLW4632 — 216Permanent Custodians Ltd v King [2010] NSWSC509; BC201003359 — 195Peterson v Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) PtyLtd (2010) 184 FCR 1; 266 ALR 1; 85 IPR 1; [2010]FCA 180; BC201001051 — 233, 239Peterson v Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) PtyLtd [2012] HCATrans 105 (11 May 2012) — 265Petlack v S C Johnson & Son Inc, Case No 08-00820(US Dist Ct, ED Wis) — 175PLIVA, Inc v Mensing, Case No 09-993 (US SupremeCourt) — 171–72PLIVA, Inc v Mensing, 131 SCt 2567 (2011) — 297Propecia (Finasteride) Product Liability Litigation,Re, MDL 2331 (EDNY) — 296Rasell v Cavalier Marketing (Australia) Pty Ltd[1991] 2 Qd R 323; (1990) 96 ALR 375; (1991) ASC56-036; (1991) ATPR 41-152 — 239, 268Reinhold v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation(No 2) [2008] NSWSC 187; BC200801327 — 195Resurfice Corp v Hanke [2007] 1 SCR 333; [2007] 4WWR 1 — 265Riegel v Medtronic, Inc, 552 US 312 (2008) — 216Rogers v Parish (Scarborough) Ltd [1987] 1 QB933 — 268Rowe v Grünenthal GmbH [2011] VSC 657;BC201110002 — 233Saloman v Saloman & Co [1897] AC 22; [1895] AllER Rep 33; (1896) 66 LJ Ch 35; 75 LT 426 — 255Schreiber Brothers Ltd v Currie Products Ltd, 1980CanLII 11 (SCC); [1980] 2 SCR 78 — 183Seltsam v McGuinness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; 19NSWCCR385;[2000]NSWCA29;BC200000735 — 235St George Bank Ltd v Quinerts Pty Ltd (2009) 25 VR666; [2009] VSCA 245; BC200909697 — 194TV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea Heidi [2004] 3SLR(R) — 253Ucak v Avante Developments [2007] NSWSC 367;BC200702721 — 194–95Union Carbide Corp v Brown, Case No 2011-M-00874 (Miss, order filed 13 July 2011) — 174Webb v Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity Inc,Case No M2009-01552-SC-R11-CV (Tenn, decided21 July 2011) — 174Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No 36 v BirdConstruction Co [1995] 1 SCR 85 — 299World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation, Re,SDNY, opinion of Judge Hellerstein 3/11/11 — 216Wright v Ford Motor Co (2007) 508 F3d 263 (5thCir) — 254Wyeth v Levine 555 US 555 (2009) — 172Yates v Mobile Marine Repairs Pty Ltd [2007]NSWSC 1463; BC200710991 — 195Zoloft (sertaline hydrochloride) Product LiabilityLitigation, Re, MDL 2342 (EDPa) — 296australian product liability reporter October 2012 315
Page 1 and 2: 2012 . Vol 22 No 10Contentspage 296
Page 3 and 4: The hottest legal topic today is th
Page 5 and 6: Canadian case law: Arora et al v Wh
Page 7 and 8: australian product liability report
Page 9 and 10: Contracts Act 1981 and the Hire Pur
Page 11 and 12: • A prohibition on unsolicited di
Page 13 and 14: The Bill aims to improve the accura
Page 15 and 16: 45. Cabinet Economic Growth and Inf
Page 17 and 18: INDEX TO VOLUME 22Table of articles
Page 19: Rolla, Francesca and Chiaves, Filip
Page 23 and 24: New South WalesCivil Liability Act
Page 25 and 26: Hire Purchase Act 1971 — 302KiwiS
Page 27 and 28: australian product liability report

Canadian case law: Arora et al v Whirlpool Canada LP and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?