24.11.2012 Views

Who Cares Wins - Royal College of Psychiatrists

Who Cares Wins - Royal College of Psychiatrists

Who Cares Wins - Royal College of Psychiatrists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

service. A comment should be made on the specific service developments that are required to<br />

meet the identified need. The implications (including cost) <strong>of</strong> investing or not investing in the<br />

scheme should be recorded.<br />

Project management and evaluation<br />

6.20 Summarise what the service objectives are and what benefits these objectives will bring.<br />

Objectives should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-linked). Ideally,<br />

they should be outcome rather than process oriented and should be listed in order <strong>of</strong> priority for<br />

the commissioner receiving the bid. A description <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> the project should be<br />

included with milestones and evaluation described according to the specified objectives.<br />

Option appraisal<br />

6.21 This section should consider a number (no more than 5) <strong>of</strong> different models <strong>of</strong> service delivery<br />

(see Section 3). One <strong>of</strong> the options considered should be the “do nothing” option.<br />

6.22 A description <strong>of</strong> each option should include details <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Staffing (medical, nursing, management, secretarial etc)<br />

• Activity (direct patient working, supervision, liaising with community, teaching and training).<br />

• Particular benefits <strong>of</strong> that model<br />

• Costs (start-up, capital and revenue including staff, accommodation, travel, administration,<br />

overheads etc)<br />

6.23 The finance department should be involved as early as possible, as all costs must be included,<br />

and this section will be closely scrutinised. There may be potential savings to other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

health economy (health or social care). The “do nothing” option should also be costed as a<br />

baseline by which others will be compared. A forecast <strong>of</strong> how costs and savings might change<br />

over the first 3 years is recommended.<br />

Risk<br />

6.24 It is recognised that in all project plans timelines for achieving milestones and figures on expected<br />

activity and cost are estimates. The inclination when applying for funding is to underestimate costs<br />

and overestimate success. Potential threats to achieving the intended objectives should be<br />

considered, particularly the more likely or critical ones. This will demonstrate that the proposal has<br />

been thoroughly thought through and that the project management will be looking out for these<br />

factors in achieving a successful outcome for the service. Consideration <strong>of</strong> risk may influence<br />

which option is preferred. There may also be risks associated with the service being more<br />

successful than intended such as waiting lists, staff burnout etc.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!