Comprehensive Evaluation of Walking Benefits PDF - Walk21

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Information ResourcesNick Cavill, Andy Cope and Angela Kennedy (2009), Valuing Increased Cycling in the Cycling Demonstration Towns, CyclingEngland, Department for Transport (www.dft.gov.uk); at www.dft.gov.uk/cyclingengland/site/wp uk/cyclingengland/site/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/valuing-content/uploads/2009/12/valuingincreased-cycling-in-the-cycling-demonstration-towns.pdf.Joe Cortright (2009), Walking the Walk: How Walkability Raises Home Values in U.S. Cities, CEOs for Cities (www.ceosforcities.org);at www.ceosforcities.org/files/WalkingTheWalk_CEOsforCities1.pdf.Jeroen Johan de Hartog, Hanna Boogaard, Hans Nijland and Gerard Hoek (2010), “Do The Health Benefits Of Cycling Outweigh TheRisks?” Environmental Health Perspectives (http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1289%2Fehp.0901747).Lawrence D. Frank , et al. (2011), An Assessment of Urban Form and Pedestrian and Transit Improvements as an Integrated GHGReduction Strategy, Washington State Department of Transportation (www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/765.1.pdf ).Thomas Gotschi (2011), “Costs and Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon,” Journal of Physical Activity and Health,Vol. 8, Supplement 1, pp. S49-S58; at http://journals.humankinetics.com/jpah-supplements-special-issues/jpah-volume-8-supplement-january/costs-and-benefits-of-bicycling-investments-in-portland-oregon.Jessica Y. Guo and Sasanka Gandavarapu (2010), “An Economic Evaluation Of Health-Promotive Built Environment Changes,”Preventive Medicine, Vol. 50, Sup. 1, January, pp. S44-S49; at www.activelivingresearch.org/resourcesearch/journalspecialissues.Todd Litman (2011), Evaluating Non-Motorized Transport Benefits and Costs, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org); atwww.vtpi.org/nmt-tdm.pdf; originally published as “Quantifying Bicycling Benefits for Achieving TDM Objectives,” TransportationResearch Record 1441, Transportation Research Board (www.trb.org), 1994, pp. 134-140.S. Turner, R. Singh, P. Quinn and T. Allatt (2011), Benefits Of New And Improved Pedestrian Facilities – Before And After Studies,Research Report 436, NZ Transport Agency (www.nzta.govt.nz); at www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/research/reports/436/docs/436.pdf.
Short and Sweet: Analysis of Shorter Trips Using National Personal Travel Survey Data“Evaluating Non-Motorized Transportation Benefits and Costs”“Evaluating Transportation Economic Development Impacts”“Smart Transportation Economic Stimulation”“Transportation Cost and Benefits Analysis”Economic Value of Walkability“Online TDM Encyclopedia”and more...www.vtpi.org
Page 1: What's ItWorth?ComprehensiveEvaluat
Page 6 and 7: Value of Highway ExpansionWhen the
Page 8 and 9: Trends Supporting Multi-ModalismMod
Page 10 and 11: Total Travel TrendsDuring the lastc
Page 12 and 13: Walking & Cycling Benefit Categorie
Page 14 and 15: Conventional EvaluationGenerally Co
Page 16 and 17: DiversityTransportation Costs$0.30$
Page 18 and 19: Counting All WalkingNMTTransitAutoM
Page 20 and 21: User BenefitsImproved walkability p
Page 22 and 23: Vehicle Cost SavingsCategory Descri
Page 24 and 25: Congestion Reduction• Some trips
Page 26 and 27: Safety BenefitsTraffic Fa atalities
Page 28 and 29: What Gets People Moving?• Recomme
Page 30 and 31: Land Use Impacts On TravelAverage D
Page 32 and 33: Property Value Impacts• 5.2% high
Page 34 and 35: Smart Growth Development• Compact
Page 36 and 37: Social EquityEquity objectives:•
Page 38 and 39: Motorists Benefit TooMore balanced
Page 40 and 41: Multi-Modal Modal Level-Of-Service
Page 42 and 43: Multi-Modal Modal PrioritizationCyc

Comprehensive Evaluation of Walking Benefits PDF - Walk21

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?