A report on iUU fishing of Baltic Sea cod - Fisheries Secretariat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ReferencesAnderson, J.L., 2002. Reasons for Technical Inefficiency of DanishBaltic Sea Trawlers. Danish Research Institute of Food Economics.Division for Fisheries Economics and ManagementDanish Directorate of Fisheries, 2002. Yearbook of Fishery Statistics2002. ISBN 87-89443-18-7 ISSN 0907-9238DW World, 2004http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1362542,00.htmlEU Commission, 2004http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries/enlargement/info_estonia_en.pdfEU Commission, 2004ahttp://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries/enlargement/info_latvia_en.pdfEU Commssion, 2004bhttp://www.eu.int/comm/fisheries/enlargement/info_poland_en.pdfEurofish, 2000http://www.eurofish.dk/indexSub.php?id=584European Commission, 2001. Commission Staff Working Paper,Fisheries Control in Member States, Denmark. SEC(2001)FAO, 1999http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/DEU/profile.htmFAO, 2001http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/POL/profile.htmFAO, 2004http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/DNK/profile.htmFAO, 2004ahttp://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/SWE/profile.htmFAO, 2004bhttp://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/RUS/profile.htmFAO, 2005http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/FIN/profile.htmFAO, 2005ahttp://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/EST/profile.htmFAO, 2005bhttp://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/LVA/profile.htmICES, 2005. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group(WGBFAS), 12-21 April 2005, Hamburg, Germany. 589 pp.Latvia National Board of Fisheries, 2005http://www.vzp.gov.lv/?sadala=110OECD, 2001http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/21/1836994.xlsOECD, 2003http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/57/34429370.pdfOECD, 2005http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/45/34428239.pdfOECD, 2005ahttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/31/34431367.pdfOECD, 2005bhttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/40/34429179.pdfPolish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2003http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/NR/rdonlyres/56D3E5E9-0D1D-411C-8811-B35170002DE5/0/sop_fisheries_final_draft_.pdfPolish Economic Affairs & Labour, 2005. EU Structural Funds inPoland,http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/English/SOP++Transport/SOP+Fisheries/Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2003.http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/NR/rdonlyres/56D3E5E9-0D1D-411C-8811-B35170002DE5/0/sop_fisheries_final_draft_.pdfRSPB, 2004. Assessment of the sustainability of industrial fisheriesproducing fish meal and oil. Poseidon Aquatic Resource ManagementLtd & the University of Newcastle upon Tyne– 50 –
Annex IBaltic Member States fishingand processing industriesOverviewThe main target species for Baltic Sea fisheriesare cod, Baltic herring and sprat. They formabout 95 % of the total catch. Other target fishspecies having either local economical importanceor ecosystem importance are Baltic salmon,plaice, flounder, dab, brill, turbot, pike-perch,pike, perch, vendace, whitefish, burbot, eel andsea-trout.The main fisheries for cod in the Baltic use demersaltrawls, pelagic trawls and gillnets. Therewas substantial increase in gillnet fisheries in the1990s but because of the change in stock agecomposition in the late 1990’s and early 2000,the share of the total catch of cod taken by gillnetshas decreased and that of demersal trawlsincreased again.Pelagic fisheries in the Baltic are dominated bypelagic trawlers catching a mixture of herringand sprat. The proportion of the two species inthe catches varies according to area and season.The catches of the pelagic species are used forhuman consumption, reduction to oil and mealand to animal fodder, and is largely dependenton market forces. The following table shows the<strong>report</strong>ed quantities, area and method of capturefor cod in the Baltic Sea in 2004.Country T=Trawl ICES Divisions in the Baltic Sea with <strong>report</strong>ed catches of codG=Gillnet Western Stock Eastern Stock22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TotalDenmark T 5,238 1,202 4,277 6,209 26 0 0 0 0 16,952G 1,082 725 789 1,145 15 0 0 0 0 3,756Germany T 2,771 0 1,268 2,659 0 0 0 0 0 6,698G 0 0 612 0 0 0 0 0 0 612Poland T 0 0 143 3,309 2,650 0 0 0 0 6,102G 0 0 395 6,658 1,012 0 0 0 0 8,065Finland T 0 0 0 354 0 4 0 0 0 358G 0 0 0 489 6 0 0 0 0 495Latvia T 0 0 0 423 602 4 193 0 0 1,222G 0 0 0 2,496 992 30 95 0 0 3,613Estonia T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0G 0 0 0 1,183 5 3 0 1 0 1,192Sweden T 0 0 701 7,491 15 246 0 0 0 8,453G 0 393 1,026 4,060 9 185 24 9 4 5,710Lithuania T 0 0 0 0 2,041 0 0 0 0 2,041G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Russia T 0 0 0 0 1,520 0 0 0 0 1,520G 0 0 0 0 1,890 0 0 0 0 1,890TOTALS T 8,009 1,202 6,389 20,445 6,854 250 193 0 0 43,342G 1,082 1,118 2,822 16,031 3,918 218 119 10 4 25,322T&G 9,091 2,320 9,211 36,476 10,772 468 311 10 4 68,664Source: data from ICES Baltic Fisheries Working Assessment Group, 2005– 51 –
Page 1 and 2: A report on IUUfis
Page 3 and 4: A report on IUUfis
Page 5 and 6: Part II 21Policy and regulatory fra
Page 7: Executive summaryThe cod fisheries
Page 10 and 11: Part IDescribing and quantifying IU
Page 12 and 13: which it has undermined their abili
Page 14 and 15: the Association of Fish Processors
Page 16 and 17: or close to fishing communities was
Page 18 and 19: Fishing in closed areasEU fisheries
Page 20 and 21: the fishing industry and, therefore
Page 22 and 23: very active on the issue and, at th
Page 24 and 25: that were adopted within the IBSFC
Page 26 and 27: Table 5. An analysis of the 11 Poin
Page 28 and 29: Action Point and its Aim6. Working
Page 30 and 31: failings in the process (see page 3
Page 32 and 33: of cod and hake. The Commission wil
Page 34 and 35: adopted in the North Sea, the Balti
Page 36 and 37: Table 6 Showing the indicators used
Page 38 and 39: Policy areas Policy theme Indicator
Page 40 and 41: Table 7. The list of types of behav
Page 42 and 43: of this Regulation is to streamline
Page 44 and 45: appeared to bear out that significa
Page 46 and 47: General headings/Sub-headingsDetail
Page 48 and 49: Notes1ICES. 2005. Report of the Bal
Page 52 and 53: DENMARKThe Baltic is the third most
Page 54 and 55: highest allowable level of dioxin i
Page 56 and 57: duction are Iceland, Norway, Japan
Page 58 and 59: The processing sectorAt the beginni
Page 60 and 61: Annex IIMembers of the Administrati
Page 62 and 63: Annex IVSummary of the European Com
Page 64 and 65: Department of Fisheries and Game (k
Page 66 and 67: InspectionsThe Fisheries Control De
Page 68 and 69: this was to exceed the maximum, the
Page 70 and 71: Theme/ PolicyareaInspection andcont

A report on iUU fishing of Baltic Sea cod - Fisheries Secretariat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?