Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project - University College ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

44 MINAPTable 4: Reperfusion treatment in EnglandThis table shows the proportion of all patients with discharge diagnosis of STEMI that received either in-hospital thrombolytic treatment or primary PCI. ‘n’ represents number of patients thatreceived either thrombolytic treatment or primary PCI. 30% of patients received no reperfusion compared to 31% in 2010/2011.Patients that receivedthrombolytic treatmentPatients that received primaryPCIPatients that receivedthrombolytic treatmentPatients that received primaryPCIYear 2010/11 2011/12n % n % n % n %England: Overall 3461 17.8% 15942 82.2% 1074 5.3% 19139 94.7%Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge 1 0 1 0Airedale General Hospital, Steeton 8 0 2 0Alexandra Hospital, Redditch 61 100% 0 9 0Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral 30 100% 0 8 0Barnsley Hospital, Barnsley 3 0 2 0Barts and the London, London 1 557 99.8% 11 639 98.3%Basildon Hospital, Basildon 43 6.8% 587 93.2% 4 615 99.4%Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital,Basingstoke0 119 100% 0 105 100%Bassetlaw Hospital, Nottingham 5 0 4 0Bedford Hospital, Bedford 3 0 1 0Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham 0 82 100% 2 120 98.4%Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham 2 332 99.4% 0 304 100%Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool 7 171 96.1% 10 554 98.2%Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford 6 2 7 2Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol 1 554 99.8% 2 599 99.7%Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford 2 1 3 0Calderdale Royal Hospital, Halifax 3 0 6 0Castle Hill Hospital, Hull 36 8.9% 370 91.1% 8 520 98.5%
Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham 8 77 90.6% 0 68 100%Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield 13 0 1 0Chorley and South Ribble Hospital, Chorley 29 100% 0 4 0Colchester General Hospital, Colchester 3 0 0 0Conquest Hospital, St Leonards on Sea 16 70 81.4% 10 100 90.9%Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester 35 100% 0 15 0County Hospital Hereford, Hereford 105 100% 0 62 100% 0Croydon <strong>University</strong> Hospital, Croydon 1 4 0 1Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle 94 100% 0 86 100% 0Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford 8 6 2 12Derriford Hospital, Plymouth 0 162 100% 0 184 100%Dewsbury District Hospital, Dewsbury 6 0 5 0Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby 59 100% 0 4 0Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster 8 0 3 0Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester 34 55.7% 27 44.3% 28 47.5% 31 52.5%East Surrey Hospital, Redhill 65 51.6% 61 48.4% 2 17Eastbourne DGH, Eastbourne 28 41.2% 40 58.8% 10 72 87.8%Epsom Hospital, Epsom 28 100% 0 0 0Fairfield General Hospital, Bury 22 100% 0 0 0Freeman Hospital, Newcastle 1 768 99.9% 2 837 99.8%Frenchay Hospital, Bristol 5 3 3 1Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley 2 163 98.8% 0 283 100%Furness General Hospital, Barrow-in-Furness 29 100% 0 8 0George Elliot Hospital, Nuneaton 3 0 1 0Glenfield Hospital, Leicester 54 16.2% 279 83.8% 6 357 98.3%Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester 2 0 0 0MINAPGood Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield 2 0 0 0Grantham and District Hospital, Grantham 48 100% 0 29 100% 045
Page 1 and 2: Myocardial IschaemiaNational Audit
Page 3 and 4: Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit
Page 5 and 6: ForewordThe annual MINAP Report, no
Page 7 and 8: Patients who received thrombolytic
Page 9 and 10: considering such factors as the age
Page 11 and 12: egarding previous medical history.
Page 13 and 14: 3. Improving quality,improving outc
Page 15 and 16: is an acute heart failure syndrome
Page 17 and 18: Alan KeysMINAP Steering Group patie
Page 19 and 20: Figure 7. Patients admitted with a
Page 21 and 22: Figure 11. Percentage of patients w
Page 23 and 24: transfers require a significant amo
Page 25 and 26: Table 8 shows the performance of th
Page 27 and 28: This year we report on the interval
Page 29 and 30: Conquest Hospital, St Leonards onSe
Page 31 and 32: Royal Derby Hospital, Derby 62 89%
Page 33 and 34: “During times of financial constr
Page 35 and 36: Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford 0 0
Page 37 and 38: Leighton Hospital, Crewe 43 86% 49
Page 39 and 40: Royal Preston Hospital, Preston 48
Page 41 and 42: Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe 11 1
Page 43: “I know that MINAP data has been
Page 47 and 48: Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manches
Page 49 and 50: Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester
Page 51 and 52: “MINAP, and its long history, is
Page 53 and 54: Table 6: Ambulance Services in Engl
Page 55 and 56: Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford
Page 57 and 58: Hexham General Hospital, Hexham 17
Page 59 and 60: Papworth Hospital, Cambridge 560 99
Page 61 and 62: Salisbury District Hospital, Salisb
Page 63 and 64: West Middlesex University Hospital,
Page 65 and 66: “We have participated in MINAP fr
Page 67 and 68: Dorset Cardiac and Stroke Network 7
Page 69 and 70: “Participation in MINAP has helpe
Page 71 and 72: Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackp
Page 73 and 74: Harefield Hospital 139 84% 156 94%
Page 75 and 76: Northern General Hospital, Sheffiel
Page 77 and 78: Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle
Page 79 and 80: Warrington Hospital, Warrington 435
Page 81 and 82: Withybush General Hospital, Haverfo
Page 83 and 84: Part Three: Case Studies1. Call act
Page 85 and 86: 3. Implementing a high-risk nSTEACS
Page 87 and 88: The British Heart Foundation is a r
Page 89 and 90: of six individual criteria - all in
Page 91 and 92: 9. Use of MINAP data to develop and
Page 93 and 94: Figure 26. Part 2 collected by Card
Page 95 and 96:
12. Shifting the FocusNicola Mannin
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 29. Funnel plot of hospital
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 30. Estimated excess risk of
Page 101 and 102:
Part 6: AppendicesAppendix 1: MINAP
Page 103 and 104:
Coronary thrombosisThe formation of
Page 105 and 106:
Birkhead J, Walker L. MINAP, a proj
Page 107:
Heart attacks recorded in MINAP in
show all

Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project - University College ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?