Bosch v Van Vuuren - LexisNexis South Africa

19“The undersigned is of the professional opinion that itwould be in the interests of the minor child if her parentsremain co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights.”And further that:“The undersigned is further of the professional opinion thatit would be in R’s best interest to remain in theRespondent’s care subject to the Applicant’s rights ofreasonable contact. The undersigned is of the professionalopinion that the contact must be slowly phased in with theassistance and guidance of the professional person.”27 Further to those comments Mrs Kriek proposed a phased regime,which was not dissimilar to that sought by the Respondent interms of his notice of motion.28 Ms Kriek’s recommendations were echoed in the report of theFamily Advocate, which was filed on or about 13 July 2012. Therecommendations contained therein read as follows: