Bosch v Van Vuuren - LexisNexis South Africa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

341. The applicant is declared to have full parental rights andresponsibilities of the minor child referred to in this judgment as“R”;2. R’s primary residence shall be with the respondent;3. The applicant shall have and be afforded contact with R as follows:3.1. With immediate effect:3.1.1. Every Tuesday from 12:00 to 17:00;3.1.2.One day per weekend, with Saturdays and Sundaysalternating, from 09:00 until 17:00;3.1.3.Reasonable telephonic access between the hours of 17:00and 18:00;3.1.4. For half of Christmas day, being either from 08:00 to13:00 or from 13:00 to 18:00, as the respondent may electand on the basis that the opposite arrangement will applythe following year, the parties alternating between morningsand afternoons;
353.1.5.For the purpose of exercising contact as per 3.1.1 abovethe applicant shall be entitled to collect R from the playschool which she currently intends and shall notifytherespondent in sufficient time to enable her to makeappropriate alternative arrangements in the event of himbeing unable to do so;3.2. From 1 February 2013:3.2.1. As set out in 3.1 above save that the applicant shall beentitled to have R spend either Friday or Saturday night withhim (as the case may be) and to that end, the period ofcontact will commence at 17H00 on Friday evening andterminate at 17:00 on Saturday in respect of “Saturdaycontact” and commenced at on which the period of contactcommences at 17:00 on Saturday and terminate at 17:00 onSunday in respect of “Sunday contact”; and3.2.2.On Fathers’ day, commencing at 09H00 and terminating at17H00; and3.2.3.For not less than 2 hours on the applicant’s birthday if hisbirthday should fall on a day when R is not with him; and
Page 1 and 2: REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICASOUTH GAUTE
Page 3 and 4: 33 The facts surrounding R’s conc
Page 5 and 6: 5regard, was that in the intervenin
Page 7 and 8: 7perceived to be “illegitimate”
Page 9 and 10: 9regard, the Respondent states that
Page 11 and 12: 11rights does not appear clearly in
Page 13 and 14: 1317 As I also sought to explain to
Page 15 and 16: 15“To discuss R….s care and mai
Page 17 and 18: 17“wonderlike speelmaat” and th
Page 19 and 20: 19“The undersigned is of the prof
Page 21 and 22: 21during the week commencing 5 Nove
Page 23 and 24: 23two daughters over an extended pe
Page 25 and 26: 25of wedlock but that the lawmaker
Page 27 and 28: 27was enacted. This represents a fu
Page 29 and 30: 2940.5 He was willing to allow R to
Page 31 and 32: 3144 Turning to the issue of costs,
Page 33: 33the proposition that counsel are
Page 37 and 38: 373.4.3.The provisions of para 3.1.

Bosch v Van Vuuren - LexisNexis South Africa

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?