Review and download Chapter 3 - Golden-winged Warbler Working ...
Review and download Chapter 3 - Golden-winged Warbler Working ...
Review and download Chapter 3 - Golden-winged Warbler Working ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
potential to become large-diameter in future<br />
rotations or retain clusters of small trees to<br />
provide some structural diversity. For basal areas<br />
less than 10 ft 2 /ac (2.3 m 2 /ha), residual trees<br />
should be dispersed throughout the st<strong>and</strong> or<br />
retained in clumps embedded within the harvest.<br />
At basal areas >35 ft 2 /ac (8.0 m 2 /ha), up to half of<br />
the residual trees should be spatially aggregated<br />
in patches <strong>and</strong> the remainder dispersed<br />
throughout the st<strong>and</strong>.<br />
In the Appalachians, use of timber harvesting<br />
followed by burning extends the<br />
habitat availability of forest st<strong>and</strong>s for<br />
<strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong>s by sustaining<br />
Mechanical Clearing<br />
Mowing <strong>and</strong> brush-hogging during the<br />
non-breeding period is another<br />
method to reduce woody growth to<br />
maintain <strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong><br />
habitat. Cutting of woody brush<br />
stems; however, tends to stimulate<br />
woody re-growth from the established<br />
roots, which may limit the subsequent<br />
period of habitat availability.<br />
Following the cutting with a selective<br />
herbicide application will often be<br />
necessary to reduce re-sprouting.<br />
Cutting should be conducted in<br />
patches to maintain the patchy woody structure<br />
that <strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong>s prefer. Cuttings in<br />
Minnesota brushl<strong>and</strong>s may reduce quality of<br />
breeding habitat for at least three years relative<br />
to unmanaged areas though no mention was<br />
made about the size <strong>and</strong> configuration of the cut<br />
areas (Hanowski et al. 1999). Thus, where the<br />
effect of mechanical cutting is not well<br />
understood, it is advised to incrementally<br />
increase the ratio of brush cleared <strong>and</strong> to<br />
evaluate <strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong> response at<br />
each cutting interval. Residual canopy trees or<br />
clusters of shrubs <strong>and</strong> saplings should be retained<br />
when present (Figure 3—20). On wet sites <strong>and</strong><br />
3–39<br />
herbaceous cover (Brose <strong>and</strong> Van Lear 1998). This<br />
practice has been used in the Midwest to<br />
promote Sharp-tailed Grouse habitat, particularly<br />
in diverse barrens (a combination of herbaceous<br />
prairie <strong>and</strong> brush prairie with 30–60% woody<br />
cover) that attract low densities of <strong>Golden</strong><strong>winged</strong><br />
<strong>Warbler</strong> (Mossman et al. 1991). When<br />
these areas are burned on longer rotations,<br />
succession leads to more woody vegetation<br />
dominated by aspen, oak, <strong>and</strong> jack pine <strong>and</strong> an<br />
associated increase in <strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong><br />
abundance.<br />
Figure 3—20. This area was mechanically treated in Bald Eagle State Park,<br />
Pennsylvania to create breeding habitat for <strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
American Woodcock. Note residual canopy trees <strong>and</strong> clumpiness of uncut<br />
saplings <strong>and</strong> shrubs. Photo by Jeffrey Larkin.<br />
sensitive soils, heavy equipment should be used<br />
only when the ground is frozen.<br />
Mechanical cutting is generally a non-commercial<br />
treatment though the number of bioenergy <strong>and</strong><br />
biofuel plants capable of utilizing woody biomass<br />
is increasing such that this may be a commercially<br />
viable option in some regions. Mowing may also<br />
be necessary to reduce vegetation height in<br />
shrubl<strong>and</strong> habitats where fire has been excluded<br />
(Figure 3—21). Mechanically lowering this<br />
vegetative fuel load may allow managers to<br />
reintroduce fire as a disturbance factor in<br />
<strong>Golden</strong>-<strong>winged</strong> <strong>Warbler</strong> habitats.