Review and download Chapter 3 - Golden-winged Warbler Working ...

Potential Partners and Priority Sites
National/Regional – Natural Resources
Conservation Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service
(Partners for Fish and Wildlife), USDA Forest
Service (Huron-Manistee National Forest), Upper
Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint
Venture
State – Michigan Department of Natural
Resources (Landowner Incentive Program),
Michigan State University Extension
NGOs – local bird clubs, Michigan Audubon,
Michigan Bird Conservation Initiative, private big
Figure 3–46. Model results showing the current predicted distribution of Golden-winged and Blue-winged warbler in
Lower Michigan. Locations without Blue-winged Warbler and inside focal areas should receive highest priority for
conservation and management actions. A smaller number of ecological variables were available to model the
estimated warbler distribution in Canada, and thus estimates for some areas within the Great Lakes Conservation
region are preliminary. The model for these focal areas may under-predict the presence of Blue-winged Warbler,
particularly in southern GL7 and GL8, and this should be considered in management planning on a site-by-site basis.
3–74
game refuges and hunting clubs, private
landowners, Ruffed Grouse Society, local forest
owners associations (contact extension service
for information)
Industry – Northland Timber Company, Pike
Lumber Company
Tribal – Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Little
Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians, Saginaw
Chippewa Tribal Nation