11.07.2015 Views

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III.4. Diffusion <strong>in</strong> a quadratic potential 2780.470.3560.350.25V(x)4µ(x)0.230.1520.110.050−4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4x0−4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4xFigure III.2.: Quadratic potential V (x) =0.5x 2 and its <strong>in</strong>variant distribution.that this is one of the rare cases where all important quantities can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed analytically.Us<strong>in</strong>g stochastic <strong>in</strong>tegrals and Ito’s formula, we derive an explicit expression for this process <strong>in</strong>Lemma A.1. Us<strong>in</strong>gthisexpression,wethenshowthatiftheprocessstartswithadistributionρ 0 ,theexpectationvalueattimet is given by E [ρ t ]=e −θt E [ρ 0 ],wherewehavedef<strong>in</strong>edθ := bmγ .Moreover,thevarianceevolvesaccord<strong>in</strong>gtoω2 [ρ t ]=e −2θt ω 2 [ρ 0 ]+(1− e −2θt )α.Regardless of the <strong>in</strong>itial distribution, the process quickly approaches the stationary Gaussiandistribution. Even the complete set of eigenfunctions can be found analytically:Lemma III.4: The propagator eigenfunctions are given by the appropriately scaled Hermitepolynomials, multiplied with the <strong>in</strong>variant measure: αφ i (x) =i−1 x(i − 1)! H i−1 √α µ(x). (III.15)The correspond<strong>in</strong>g eigenvalues are λ i (τ) =e −θ(i−1)τ .Proof. We also show the proof of this Lemma <strong>in</strong> the appendix.S<strong>in</strong>ce there is only one potential m<strong>in</strong>imum, there are no metastable states. Unless b is verysmall or mass and friction are very large, the global relaxation time −τ = τ = mγlog λ 2is(τ) θτ bshort, the process quickly equilibrates to its <strong>in</strong>variant distribution.S<strong>in</strong>ce all these analytic quantities are at hand, we can compare them to the results obta<strong>in</strong>edfrom the Roothan-Hall method. As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure III.3, arelativelysmallnumericaleffortleads to a good approximation of the eigenfunctions as well as the correspond<strong>in</strong>g eigenvaluesand implied time scales. Though this example may be a simple one, it is still important. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!