11.07.2015 Views

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

Variational Principles in Conformation Dynamics - FU Berlin, FB MI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III.5. Two-well potential 29molecular simulations, a harmonic potential is often used to model bonds between atoms,as well as bond angles. The harmonic potential will therefore frequently show up <strong>in</strong> applications.III.5. Two-well potentialAnother important example is a two-well potential. In general, this is some potential functiondisplay<strong>in</strong>g two m<strong>in</strong>imum positions which are separated by a significant energy barrier, andwhich rises to <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity both to the left and to the right of the m<strong>in</strong>ima. For our calculations,we choose V (x) =k(x 4 − 2x 2 +1) for some k>0, whichhastwom<strong>in</strong>imaatx = −1and x =1.Theenergyfunctionandthe<strong>in</strong>variantdistributionaredisplayed<strong>in</strong>Figure III.4aand Figure III.4b. Thetwo-wellpotentialisagoodmodelforcerta<strong>in</strong>molecular<strong>in</strong>teractionswhere a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of freedom favours two characteristic positions. The regions aroundthe potential m<strong>in</strong>ima correspond to metastable states, we therefore expect one dom<strong>in</strong>antslow process apart from the stationary process. We apply the Roothan-Hall method us<strong>in</strong>gthirteen Gaussian functions centred around the two m<strong>in</strong>ima, with uniform variance equalto 0.5. In order to evaluate the results, we also computed the eigenvalues of an MSMtransition matrix. Here, we used a f<strong>in</strong>e discretization of the state space <strong>in</strong>to 100 sets, mostof them situated close to the potential m<strong>in</strong>ima. A comparison of the results can be seen<strong>in</strong> Figure III.4. Most importantly, we see that the implied time scales are estimated verywell. Both methods converge quickly to about the same value. The stationary distributionis very well approximated, and we obta<strong>in</strong> a conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g result for the second eigenfunction,clearly display<strong>in</strong>g a characteristic sign change between the two metastable regions. Thecomputational effort required by the Roothan-Hall method is much smaller, s<strong>in</strong>ce we onlyneed to compute an eleven by eleven matrix <strong>in</strong>stead of a 100 × 100 matrix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!