271. Memorandum of Conversation1 Moscow, May 24, 1972, 7:50 ...
271. Memorandum of Conversation1 Moscow, May 24, 1972, 7:50 ...
271. Memorandum of Conversation1 Moscow, May 24, 1972, 7:50 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>May</strong> 13–<strong>May</strong> 31, <strong>1972</strong> 1051<br />
a problem <strong>of</strong> war. More especially it is a problem <strong>of</strong> a war which is<br />
poisoning the general international situation as a whole and because<br />
it is having an effect on relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.<br />
I wish to emphasize it is particularly important to note this at this precise<br />
moment when cruel bombing has been resumed and where once<br />
again very cruel military actions have been taken against North Vietnam.<br />
I had occasion to talk about this with Dr. Kissinger, but we want<br />
to take this opportunity now to emphasize that not only we but most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nations <strong>of</strong> the world are calling this a shameful war and quite<br />
rightly calling it aggression. 7<br />
There is perhaps indeed no need for us to go into all the details <strong>of</strong><br />
the past, but there is one point that we should like to emphasize and<br />
that is the new escalation <strong>of</strong> the war, particularly the bombing <strong>of</strong> North<br />
Vietnam started by you at the very time when the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers, our Prime Minister, was in Hanoi [1965]. At that<br />
time, North Vietnam wasn’t doing anything.<br />
You have just given your own assessment <strong>of</strong> this war and your<br />
own explanation for the war. We must most resolutely and forthrightly<br />
tell you, Mr. President, that our assessment is <strong>of</strong> a fundamentally different<br />
nature. You have heard on more than one occasion our assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> this war in the statement <strong>of</strong> all the leaders <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union.<br />
Perhaps we do not wish at this time to engage in polemics here on this<br />
subject, but we must say that we shall not depart from our assessment<br />
because we are pr<strong>of</strong>oundly convinced that it is right.<br />
I agree, as I have said before, that we should not delve deep into<br />
the past; but certainly the fact is that the Geneva Accords 8 which established<br />
the basis for peace in Indochina were grossly violated. And<br />
it would be appropriate to mention where these agreements were violated.<br />
It is a fact that the elections in South Vietnam envisaged by the<br />
Geneva Accords were not held, and it is no secret why this was not<br />
done. It was quite clear at that time who would win the election and<br />
on which side lay the support <strong>of</strong> the Vietnamese people.<br />
7 In his memoirs Nixon wrote that everyone had been in a good humor when they<br />
got back to the dacha and Brezhnev had suggested they have a meeting before dinner,<br />
which had been scheduled for 8. “For the next three hours the Soviet leaders pounded<br />
me bitterly and emotionally about Vietnam.” He recalled that he “momentarily thought<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde when Brezhnev, who had just been laughing and slapping<br />
me on the back, started shouting angrily that instead <strong>of</strong> honestly working to end the<br />
war, I was trying to use the Chinese as a means <strong>of</strong> bringing pressure on the Soviets to<br />
intervene with the North Vietnamese.” (RN: Memoirs, p. 613)<br />
8 The July 1954 Geneva accords which ended the hostilities in Indochina and provided<br />
for a temporary partition <strong>of</strong> Vietnam pending a nationwide election in the summer<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1956.