Defense ARJ - Defense Acquisition University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Defense Acquisition Review Journal 148 RefeRences Assad, S. D., Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy. Proper use of award fee contracts and award fee provisions. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics memorandum, April 24, 2007. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). (2006, July 11). DFARS (Part 216). Retrieved May 13, 2008, from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/VFD- FARA.HTM Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). (2008, April 22). FAR (Part 16). Retrieved May 13, 2008, from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm Garrett, G. A. & Gilbreth, A. S. (1993). Innovative approaches to creating, allocation, and implementing award fees in systems acquisition. Proceedings from 1993 Acquisition Research Symposium, co-hosted by the Defense Systems Management College and the National Contract Management Association, 225–237. Tremaine, R. L. (2007, September–October). Incentive contracts: Driving favorable outcomes. Defense AT&L, 36(5), 7–11. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2005, December). DoD has paid billions in award and incentive fees regardless of the outcomes. (GAO-06-66). Washington, DC: Author.
endnotes HoW to Make incentiVe systeM of anD systeMs aWarD DeVeloPMent fees Work 1. Commercial Gateway Baltimore contracting officer’s E-mail response, January 11, 2007, to research team interview/follow-up question. 2. Incentive Fee Clause excerpted from U.S. Army TACOM Life Cycle Management Command Contract W56HZV-05-C-0724, System Development and Demonstration issued in 2005. 149
Page 2 and 3:
Vacant Office of Small Business Pro
Page 4 and 5:
133 151 disruption of testing regim
Page 7 and 8:
Defense ARJ executiVe eDitor Defens
Page 9 and 10:
July 2008 Joint attack Munition sys
Page 11 and 12:
Does orGaniZational leVel influence
Page 13 and 14: creatiVe Potential anD PracticeD cr
Page 15 and 16: Does orGaniZational leVel influence
Page 31 and 32: lessons froM tHe DeVeloPMent of arM
Page 33 and 34: tAble 1. suMMary Case inforMation S
Page 41 and 42: tAble 9. Continuity of tradoC staff
Page 49 and 50: HoW to Make incentiVe systeM of anD
Page 51 and 52: tAble 2. suMMary of Consensus views
Page 63: conclusions HoW to Make incentiVe s
Page 67 and 68: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? PPBe: a
Page 69 and 70: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? 1995).
Page 71 and 72: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? cation;
Page 73 and 74: Our policy to counter international
Page 75 and 76: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? reminis
Page 77 and 78: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? process
Page 79 and 80: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? COE. As
Page 81 and 82: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? with th
Page 83 and 84: RefeRences PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pi
Page 85 and 86: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? Martin,
Page 87 and 88: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? Wachows
Page 89 and 90: PPBe: a reD or a Blue Pill? 6. The
Page 91 and 92: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent syste
Page 93 and 94: tHe Defense acQuisition fraMeWork:
Page 95 and 96: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent tHe D
Page 97 and 98: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent searc
Page 99 and 100: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent “em
Page 101 and 102: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent for l
Page 103 and 104: systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMent DAPA
Page 105 and 106: � � systeM of systeMs DeVeloPMe
Page 107 and 108: RefeRences systeM of systeMs DeVelo
Page 109 and 110: endnotes systeM of systeMs DeVeloPM
Page 111 and 112: a GliMPse into DoD WeaPon systeMs P
Page 113 and 114: � � � � � � � systeM
Page 115 and 116:
systeM DoD WeaPon of systeMs DeVelo
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123:
Page 126 and 127:
Defense Acquisition Review Journal
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
defense Acqu s t on un vers ty web
Page 132:
show all

Defense ARJ - Defense Acquisition University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?