11.07.2015 Views

The Sky is Not the Limit: - Carbon Trade Watch

The Sky is Not the Limit: - Carbon Trade Watch

The Sky is Not the Limit: - Carbon Trade Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 Corporate ‘good guys’?<strong>The</strong> third tactic of corporations <strong>is</strong> newand firmly splits <strong>the</strong> corporate worldneatly in two. <strong>The</strong>re are <strong>the</strong>ExxonMobils who are ‘old-school’, diehardobstructers and deniers.Campaigners have targeted Exxon,and it <strong>is</strong> well known now that <strong>the</strong>y areagainst <strong>the</strong> Kyoto process, firmlybelieving that industry can solve <strong>the</strong>problem if left to take voluntary action.A memo from Exxon to <strong>the</strong> Bushadmin<strong>is</strong>tration in February 2001suggested that <strong>the</strong> US lobby get rid of<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n head of <strong>the</strong> IPCC, BobWatson, who <strong>is</strong> an outspoken andradical scient<strong>is</strong>t whose views Exxond<strong>is</strong>likes. 1 At <strong>the</strong> subsequent election inApril 2002 for <strong>the</strong> head of <strong>the</strong> IPCC,<strong>the</strong> US voted against Bob Watson andhe was ousted. A coincidence, or anexample of <strong>the</strong> kind of l<strong>is</strong>tening earthat a US $1,200,000 campaigncontribution can buy. 2And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re are BP, Shell andEnron who are at <strong>the</strong> forefront ofreinventing <strong>the</strong>mselves as being ‘goodguys’. In 1998 Kenneth Lay, <strong>the</strong> CEOof Enron, sent a letter to Bill Clintonwhich requested that he do as muchas possible to harm <strong>the</strong> credibility of<strong>the</strong> climate sceptic scient<strong>is</strong>ts. Enronsaw that Kyoto, “would do more topromote Enron’s business than willalmost any o<strong>the</strong>r regulatory initiative,”and was one of <strong>the</strong> main proponentsof em<strong>is</strong>sions trading. 3 Along wi<strong>the</strong>xpensive PR campaigns such asBP’s environmental ‘BeyondPetroleum’ make-over, <strong>the</strong>se‘progressive’ corporations havesuccessfully advanced <strong>the</strong> concept of<strong>the</strong> Public-Private-Partnership (PPP).name ofcorporation$ spent onrenewables% of totalinvestmentsBPAmoco 50 million 5 3Shell 100 million 6 0.1ExxonMobil insignificant 7 insignificantChevronTexaco275 million 8 2.8Based on projections for <strong>the</strong> current and futureinvestments compared with total expenditure for2001. 9corporate engagement in internationalprocesses, best epitom<strong>is</strong>ed by whathappened at <strong>the</strong> WSSD inJohannesburg in 2002. <strong>The</strong>re were nolegally binding agreements reached atth<strong>is</strong> second Earth Summit. Instead,over 280 PPPs were showcaseddemonstrating a lack of political will tomake strong dec<strong>is</strong>ions and <strong>the</strong>enthusiasm of corporations to takecontrol of solutions. 4By making low-cost investments inenvironmental projects, BP hasreshaped public perception of <strong>the</strong>m,making it possible to continue‘business-as-usual’ having deflectedcritic<strong>is</strong>m onto less soph<strong>is</strong>ticatedcorporations such as ExxonMobil. Th<strong>is</strong>third approach <strong>is</strong> a development of16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!