ased on <strong>the</strong> “successful” PCF modeland describes itself as “an opportunityto attract private capital to biodiversityprotection, soil conservation andsustainable community development.” 4<strong>The</strong> Fund works on <strong>the</strong> same principleas <strong>the</strong> PCF by managing a pool ofinvestment money, which <strong>is</strong>contributed by partners. <strong>The</strong>separtners so far include commitmentsfrom fourteen private companies from<strong>the</strong> banking, energy, and consultingsectors. 5<strong>The</strong> Prototype <strong>Carbon</strong> Fund (PCF):<strong>The</strong> Prototype <strong>Carbon</strong> Fund has beenoperating since 1999 and aims tostimulate <strong>the</strong> carbon markets,specifically <strong>the</strong> project-basedmechan<strong>is</strong>ms CDM and JI. It acts asany o<strong>the</strong>r project-based investmentfund would and provides returns to its‘partners’ from profits generated inprojects. It <strong>is</strong> based in <strong>the</strong> World Bankheadquarters in Washington and hastwenty staff. 6 <strong>The</strong> PCF <strong>is</strong> intended forlarger renewable energy and efficiencyprojects with a particular emphas<strong>is</strong> on‘public-private partnerships’. Alongwith <strong>the</strong> Dutch government’s JI andCDM programmes (CERUPT andERUPT), PCF <strong>is</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> mostsignificant influence on marketexpectations of price and verificationrules. <strong>The</strong> PCF states ra<strong>the</strong>rdefensively on its website that <strong>the</strong>World Bank ”does not intend to remainas a player in th<strong>is</strong> market”, “nei<strong>the</strong>rseeks a favoured nor monopol<strong>is</strong>ticposition under <strong>the</strong> UNFCCC” and“does not w<strong>is</strong>h to position itself as <strong>the</strong>institution which will implement <strong>the</strong>CDM.” 7 Sources report <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong>critic<strong>is</strong>m from outside and within <strong>the</strong>bank that brokerage and marketdevelopment do not fit within <strong>the</strong> WorldBank’s mandate of poverty alleviation.5.2 CorporationsBP-Amoco: <strong>The</strong> BP pilot scheme,designed in collaboration with USNGO Environmental Defense in 1999,was <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> first majorcorporate ‘cap-and-trade’ greenhousegas trading scheme. BP-Amoco’soverall target <strong>is</strong> a 10 per centreduction below 1990 levels by 2010(tougher than <strong>the</strong> average 5.2 per centKyoto target). <strong>The</strong>y claim to alreadyhave achieved 5 per cent of thattarget, mostly through reducing gasflaring in offshore activities. 1Enron: <strong>The</strong> bru<strong>is</strong>ed, battered andbankrupt corporate giant <strong>is</strong> not downfor <strong>the</strong> count yet. Despite a d<strong>is</strong>astrousyear for energy trader, Enron stillranks number five on <strong>the</strong> Fortune 500l<strong>is</strong>t for 2002, 2 and intends to re-openfor business. Despite being widelyknown as one of <strong>the</strong> largestbankruptcies in corporate h<strong>is</strong>tory, ithas also been an early player in <strong>the</strong>em<strong>is</strong>sions trading markets, particularlyin <strong>the</strong> USA where it offered brokerageand consultancy services to powerutilities and industrial consumers.Its subsidiary, Enron Global Markets,special<strong>is</strong>ed in SO2 and NOX trading inNorth America. <strong>The</strong> companypioneered <strong>the</strong> use of many financialinstruments in <strong>the</strong> em<strong>is</strong>sions markets.It also promoted <strong>the</strong> concept of crosscommodityswaps, whereby em<strong>is</strong>sionspermits could be traded for quantitiesof gas and coal. It lobbied aggressivelyto expand em<strong>is</strong>sions trading markets,particularly in greenhouse gases. 3Breaking ranks with o<strong>the</strong>r energycorporations, Enron came out insupport of <strong>the</strong> Kyoto Protocol, excitedmore by <strong>the</strong> opportunity to expand itsem<strong>is</strong>sions trading services to cover aglobal market, than <strong>the</strong> more limitedsingle gas markets in North America.Shell: Internal cap-and-trade systemlaunched in 1998, which developedinto <strong>the</strong> Shell Tradable Em<strong>is</strong>sion30
Permit System (STEPs) programme in2000. Shell aims to reduce GHGem<strong>is</strong>sions 10 per cent below 1990levels by 2002 and exceed Kyototargets through 2010. <strong>The</strong> tradingsystem includes Shell business unitsin Sou<strong>the</strong>rn countries, which will hostem<strong>is</strong>sion-reduction projects. <strong>The</strong>sepermit-generating projects and <strong>the</strong>way <strong>the</strong> permits can be sold on into<strong>the</strong> system are modelled on <strong>the</strong> CDM. 45.3 Corporate Lobby GroupsJust as <strong>the</strong> business community oncelobbied for ‘more evidence on climatechange’ and <strong>the</strong>n ‘<strong>the</strong> inclusion ofmarket-based mechan<strong>is</strong>ms to achievegreenhouse gas reductions’, <strong>the</strong>y arenow lobbying for as many marketopportunities as possible within <strong>the</strong>Kyoto trading regime. <strong>The</strong> manydifferent trading schemes create a r<strong>is</strong>kthat <strong>the</strong> market will developincompatibilities at <strong>the</strong> internationaland national levels.A fragmented market ra<strong>is</strong>es businesscosts, since bridging mechan<strong>is</strong>msbetween schemes will have to becreated and it generally becomesmore difficult for companies to manager<strong>is</strong>k. Business also repeatedly lobbiesfor rule standard<strong>is</strong>ation betweendifferent trading schemes. <strong>The</strong>corporate argument <strong>is</strong> that <strong>the</strong> legaland admin<strong>is</strong>trative costs of completinga trade need to be as low as possiblefor <strong>the</strong> markets to be “cost-effective” -thus equating cheapness with costeffectiveness.International Chamber ofCommerce (ICC): <strong>The</strong> mostprominent and powerful of corporatelobby groups <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICC and <strong>the</strong>irposition reflects most accurately <strong>the</strong>spectrum of corporate lobbyingstrategies. At <strong>the</strong> last subsidiarybodies meeting of <strong>the</strong> UNFCCC before<strong>the</strong> WSSD in 2002, ExxonMobilpresented <strong>the</strong> ICC d<strong>is</strong>cussion paperon <strong>the</strong> role of companies in <strong>the</strong> KyotoMechan<strong>is</strong>ms. <strong>The</strong> d<strong>is</strong>cussion paperstates that <strong>the</strong> ICC believes:• countries should recogn<strong>is</strong>e all validgreenhouse gas em<strong>is</strong>sion permitsregardless of <strong>the</strong> national source orfinal owner of <strong>the</strong> permits;• nations should not impose importor export controls on exchanges ofgreenhouse gas em<strong>is</strong>sions permits;31