11.07.2015 Views

The Difference between an Absolute and a Limited Monarchy

The Difference between an Absolute and a Limited Monarchy

The Difference between an Absolute and a Limited Monarchy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

th<strong>an</strong>ks in the m<strong>an</strong>y quarters where that tribute is due.I have to th<strong>an</strong>k the Delegates of the Clarendon Press forthe generous confidence with which they accepted the workof <strong>an</strong> untried h<strong>an</strong>d, <strong>an</strong>d for the liberality with which theypermitted <strong>an</strong> extension of its scope much beyond what wasoriginally contemplated. To the Lord Bishop of Chester Iam under special obligations ; who not only encouragedme to undertake the work, but both as a Delegate of thePress <strong>an</strong>d in his private capacity heIped it forward at a greatexpenditure of trouble to himself; to his published writingsI, in common with all students of history, owe a debt ofgratitude which c<strong>an</strong> never be adequately expressed. To theRev. C. W. Boase, Fellow of Exeter College, I am indebtedfor const<strong>an</strong>t encouragement <strong>an</strong>d assist<strong>an</strong>ce ; nor am I the firstwho has profited by his wealth of historical learning ; whileProfessor Skeat gave me much kind help <strong>an</strong>d advice withreference to points of philology. Mr. Edward Edwards.the well-known <strong>an</strong>d accomplished author of the Life ofRalegh, took more trouble th<strong>an</strong> I like to think of, in theendeavour to clear up some points in which I was interested.That his researches were not always crowned with successdoes not diminish my sense of gratitude. <strong>The</strong> help whichI have received in regard to special points is acknowledgedin the book itself. I am indebted to Lord Calthorpe forthe facilities which he afforded me in consulting the YelvertonMS., to Mr. Henry Rradshaw for similar favours inregard to the Cambridge MS., <strong>an</strong>d to the Master <strong>an</strong>dFellows of Trinity College, Cambridge, for the lo<strong>an</strong> of theirMS. containing the Epitome; while to the Provost <strong>an</strong>dFellows of Queen's College, Oxford, my th<strong>an</strong>ks are due forallowing me even a larger use of their valuable library th<strong>an</strong>that which they so liberally accord to all Graduates. Ihave to th<strong>an</strong>k Mr. W. D. Selby, who directed my researchesat the Record Office ; <strong>an</strong>d Mr. E. J. L. Scott, of the Departmentof MSS., who did me the like service at the Britishg%eface,Museum. At the Bodlei<strong>an</strong> I received const<strong>an</strong>t help fromMr. Mad<strong>an</strong> the Sub-Librari<strong>an</strong>, while Mr. Macray was <strong>an</strong>unfailing oracle on all points of palaography. I shouldlike also to th<strong>an</strong>k generally the officials of all the threeinstitutions which I have named, for their unfailing courtesy,<strong>an</strong>d helpfulness. To the m<strong>an</strong>y friends who havehelped me, if indirectly, yet very really by their sympathy<strong>an</strong>d the interest they have taken in my work, I would alsohere return my grateful th<strong>an</strong>ks. To one of them this workwould probably have been dedicated, were it not thatdedications are said to be somewhat out of date in thisenlightened age.C. C. C., OXON.,]U& 29, 1885.xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!