12.07.2015 Views

Profiting from a Demographic Shift in the 21st Century

Profiting from a Demographic Shift in the 21st Century

Profiting from a Demographic Shift in the 21st Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Profit<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>from</strong> a<strong>Demographic</strong> <strong>Shift</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong>Randall WestgrenCanadian Meat Council8 May 2008


What drives consumer choice?– <strong>Demographic</strong>s– Lifestyle– Habit vs. Novelty-seek<strong>in</strong>g– Learn<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>formation)


Population age dynamics -Canada% population over 5050%40%30%28.9%32.0%35.4%38.3% 3%20%10%0%2001 2006 2011 2016


Ethnic Diversity - Canada%immigrants <strong>in</strong> 1990-1996 period50%49%40%30%27%20%10%0%7%7%Europe Africa Asia Hispanic


Ethnic Diversity -US% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population p 1998- 200840%30%36%31%20%10%6%13%8%0%W hite Black Asian Hispanic Total


Dual Income Families - Canada% Dual-<strong>in</strong>come Family Households70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%37%61%1980 1995 200570%


Dual Income Families - US% Dual-<strong>in</strong>come Family Households60%50%40%30%20%10%37%45% 50%0%1978 1998 2008


Small households - Canada% of s<strong>in</strong>gle households40.0% 0%30.4% 33.6%36.1%36.4%30.0%20.0%10.0%0.0%1971 1981 1991 1996


Small households - US% of s<strong>in</strong>gle households40%30%24%30%33%20%10%0%1978 1998 2008


What does it mean when we have– <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>gle-person households?– <strong>in</strong>creased dual-<strong>in</strong>come households?– <strong>in</strong>creased population over 50?– <strong>in</strong>creased numbers of Asian and Hispanicconsumers?


First-order effects• Dual <strong>in</strong>comes imply• higher disposable <strong>in</strong>come• <strong>in</strong>creased time constra<strong>in</strong>ts for“consumption”• Therefore <strong>in</strong>creased demand for high-endproducts AND• convenient meal solutions• “beh<strong>in</strong>d-<strong>the</strong>-wheel-friendly” foods


First-order effectsS<strong>in</strong>gle person households imply• smaller packages• convenience• high away-<strong>from</strong>-home consumption• lower “food <strong>in</strong>terest”


First-order effectsGrowth <strong>in</strong> ethnic consum<strong>in</strong>g populationsimplies• different product mix at retail• diversity <strong>in</strong> food service


First-order effectsAg<strong>in</strong>g population implies higherdisposable <strong>in</strong>comes


Second-order order effects– Affluence tends to break traditional sociodemographicconsumption patterns– The products that are brought out forethnic markets are adopted by broaderconsumer markets– Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of time constra<strong>in</strong>ts andaffluence leads to “eaterta<strong>in</strong>ment”


The problems with demographics• They imply behavioral norms based on “whatyou look like”• <strong>Demographic</strong>s are no longer stable predictorsover time• “What we look like” is less important than“how we behave”• Let’s call this “lifestyle” for now


After all <strong>the</strong>se years• “Dis-moi ce que tu manges, je te dirai ce quetu es.” - Jean An<strong>the</strong>lme Brillat-Savar<strong>in</strong>1825


Lifestyle - behavior% who eat a home-cooked d<strong>in</strong>ner 6-7 nights per week“loners” married married notmarriedw/o kids w/ kids w/ kids44% 46% 45% 45%Source: Peter Hart for Grocery Mfrs Assn, 1998


Lifestyle - behavior% who d<strong>in</strong>e with entire household 6-7 nights per week“loners” married id married id not marriedw/o kids w/ kids w/ kidsN/A 60% 52% 54%Source: Peter Hart for Grocery Mfrs Assn, 1998


Lifestyle - behavior% who buy a ready-to-eat meal 2 or more nights perweek“loners” married married not marriedw/o kids w/ kids w/ kids39% 27% 33% 42%Source: Peter Hart for Grocery Mfrs Assn, 1998


Lifestyle - behavior% who use microwave almost all <strong>the</strong> time/veryoften“loners” married married not marriedw/o kids w/ kids w/ kids43% 36% 33% 29%


Some emerg<strong>in</strong>g lifestyle l issues• Fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g product categories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>“center of <strong>the</strong> store”• TASTE, INDULGENCE, VARIETY• FUNCTIONALITY


Some emerg<strong>in</strong>g lifestyle issues• “Echo Boomers” are a strange, volatileage cohort• BIG <strong>in</strong>to self-<strong>in</strong>dulgence• Most likely to shop <strong>in</strong> Supercenters• Low <strong>in</strong>comes with high consumptionaspirations• Novelty-seekers• Ethnicity doesn’t drive purchases


More learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities• Experimentation, novelty-seek<strong>in</strong>g, and ethnic“boundary-jump<strong>in</strong>g” occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foodservicesector• Good news – s<strong>in</strong>ce we have 1 ½ generationsof <strong>in</strong>ept home cooks• Ironically, TV may save us, especially withEcho Boomers


Habituation vs. Novelty– Habituation is a classic response to <strong>the</strong> hugenumber of consumption choices before us– Food products are EXPERIENCE GOODS,as are food retailer patronage, and restaurantchoice


Habituation vs. NoveltyPositivesatisfactionNoveltyNegativesatisfactionThe Wundt curve


Habituation vs. Novelty– There is a constant tension between <strong>the</strong> comfort ofhabitual purchases and <strong>the</strong> search for novelty– Market<strong>in</strong>g expenditures flow to this tension:• re<strong>in</strong>force positive satisfaction for exist<strong>in</strong>g products• present new choices <strong>in</strong> product categories– Marketers battle over which brands/items will enterour “evoked set” dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g task


How do we “make a market”?• Consumers on one side with• Chang<strong>in</strong>g basic demographics• Increas<strong>in</strong>gly specific behavior segments• Increas<strong>in</strong>gly unstable “presence” <strong>in</strong> segments• Interest t<strong>in</strong> novelty• Food marketers with• Huge capacity to generate new products• Blurred, fragmented market channels


How do we “make a market”?• Use <strong>the</strong> metaphor of maps:• Consumers have an <strong>in</strong>complete mental map of <strong>the</strong>array of choices <strong>the</strong>y have to purchase food(products, sources)• Marketers have a fuzzy, <strong>in</strong>complete mental mapof consumer needs, wants, desires• Both parties are “navigat<strong>in</strong>g” g with imperfectmaps, try<strong>in</strong>g to meet at <strong>the</strong> cash register


The complication of “what isbe<strong>in</strong>g purchased?”• Consumers don’t really consume products• They consume complex goods that <strong>the</strong>y “construct”<strong>from</strong> products bought at retail OR <strong>the</strong>y buy complexgoods that someone constructs for <strong>the</strong>m (foodservice)• The value <strong>the</strong>y get <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>se complex goods comes<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of characteristics <strong>the</strong>yconsume


Characteristics of Consumption Goods• Intr<strong>in</strong>sic characteristics <strong>in</strong> food products• Nutritive• Organoleptic• Physical/ l/biologicali l• Extr<strong>in</strong>sic characteristics• Psychic: tradition, sophistication, economy• Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment• ConvenienceWhere do “story” products fit?


Navigat<strong>in</strong>g– Consumers navigate <strong>from</strong> memory, even if<strong>the</strong>ir mental map of consumption possibilitiesdoesn’t match up with “reality” -- habituation– To f<strong>in</strong>d novelty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> landscape ofconsumption possibilities, <strong>the</strong>y need signposts‣Who makes <strong>the</strong> signposts?


‣Signposts:Navigat<strong>in</strong>g• Consumer advertis<strong>in</strong>gi• Po<strong>in</strong>t-of-purchase <strong>in</strong> retail• Food service <strong>in</strong>dustry• The “early warn<strong>in</strong>g system” for novelty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US.• Note that <strong>the</strong> food retail system is generallydevoid of personal <strong>in</strong>formation sources,unlike most consumer products markets,except…

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!