Implementation of Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative in Ahmed ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

adopted so as to the cover the needed practices in cardiac surgery in AGCC, particularly thepreoperative preparation care that occur in the clinic and wards. Some of them particularly twoof the surgeons questioned the third criterion of measurability and raised some doubt. In practicalapplication they commented about the importance of quality management system improvement,data management and analysis, training and capacity building, increasing the awareness ofpatients and availing more resources to support the change.Using simple and short questionnaire, I conducted a survey about the checklist; most of the staffagreed as shown in figure 6 that the checklist is simple, applicable and takes less than threeminutes. Around two third of them agreed that the checklist is measurable. Most of the staffdecided that the checklist needs adaptation.Figure 7 shown most of the staff agreed that the checklist encourage communication, enhancedthe teamwork, helped recall, supported the systematic check and enhanced safety.Almost all staff agreed about the effectiveness of the checklist in creating safety culture andsafety practices. This approach of risk assessment in multidisciplinary team was provedeffectiveness in other high risk industries such as aviation, factories, and nuclear industries.In traditional hierarchy the senior inhibit the juniors, and doctors give no chance to other teammembers.This leadership skills, management tools, risk management best practice, was brought from otherindustries to healthcare services such as in the Safe Surgery Saves lives.44
Staff Opinion about Checklist87%98%85%95%67%take < 3 minutesneed adaptationmeasurableapplicablesimpleFigure 6: Staff Opinion about checklistChecklist Impact75%92%88%91%97%enhance safetysupportsystematicprocesseshelps recallenhanceteamworkencouragecommunicationsFigure 7: The Checklist implementation impact45
Page 1 and 2: Royal College of Surgeons in Irelan
Page 3 and 4: Implementation of Safe Surgery Save
Page 6 and 7: 3.3.4 Mainstreaming ...............
Page 8 and 9: AbstractAim: This paper reports on
Page 10 and 11: Chapter 1Introduction1.1 Introducti
Page 12 and 13: Figure 1: Map of Piloted CitiesDeri
Page 14 and 15: Chapter 2Literature Review2.1 Intro
Page 16 and 17: The framework aims to represent a c
Page 18: 2.3 The checklistHealthcare relies
Page 21 and 22: healthcare staff by producing the S
Page 23 and 24: nature of many of these work system
Page 25 and 26: piloting, framing to promote Checkl
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 3Methods3.1 IntroductionThe
Page 29 and 30: Time out phase:Before skin incision
Page 31 and 32: 3.3.1 InitiationThe purpose of this
Page 33 and 34: meeting, where a surprising event h
Page 35 and 36: The change project team designed in
Page 37 and 38: performing the surgery will continu
Page 39 and 40: consent ,as the one previously used
Page 41 and 42: area was yet to encouraged as the c
Page 43 and 44: of the project. These incentives do
Page 45: medical and nursing staff before an
Page 49 and 50: Chapter 5Discussion and Conclusion5
Page 51 and 52: y improving the reporting system de
Page 53 and 54: 5.6 ConclusionThe implementation of
Page 55 and 56: HSE. (2008, July). Improving ourser

Implementation of Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative in Ahmed ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?