26Project titleContribu<strong>to</strong>rsFundingSummaryUsing the internet <strong>to</strong> increase physical activity in adolescents with cerebral palsy– are you kidding?Carol Maher (University of South Australia and <strong>Novita</strong> Children’s <strong>Services</strong>), A/Prof MarieWilliams (University of South Australia), Prof Tim Olds (University of South Australia), Dr AlisonLane (University of South Australia)• Cerebral Palsy Foundation Doc<strong>to</strong>ral <strong>Research</strong> GrantInteractive online computer-based programs are a relatively new medium for facilitatinghealth-related behaviour change. They offer numerous advantages over face-<strong>to</strong>-face delivery,including 24-hour availability, novelty, accessibility regardless of transport issues and onceestablished, low operating costs. This study tested the effectiveness of a purpose-designed,internet-based interactive intervention aimed at improving physical activity and relatedbehaviours in adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). The program (named GetSet) is a ninemodule intervention program based on the Social Cognitive Theory, incorporating education,self-reflection, goal-setting and positive role-modeling.GetSet was tested using a randomised controlled trial, in which twenty adolescents with CPused the program and 21 adolescents with CP acted as controls. Assessments were carriedout at baseline, immediately post-intervention (12 weeks after baseline) and 10 weeks postintervention(22 weeks after baseline). The 22 week assessments are currently underway.Preliminary analyses based on the baseline and 12 week data suggest promising results,however it will be important <strong>to</strong> see if these trends are maintained longer-term.Method<strong>Novita</strong> clients aged 11-17 with CP, mild-<strong>to</strong>-moderate levels of physical disability, consideredby their parent <strong>to</strong> have adequate reading and comprehension skills <strong>to</strong> use the website andwho lived near Adelaide were eligible for the study. Participants who agreed <strong>to</strong> be involvedwere randomly assigned <strong>to</strong> intervention or control groups. Intervention group participantsreceived a one-on-one introduction <strong>to</strong> the GetSet website and were encouraged <strong>to</strong> logon<strong>to</strong> the website at least weekly for eight weeks. Blinded assessments were carried out atbaseline, immediately post-intervention and 10 weeks post-intervention. The primary outcomemeasures were seven-day objective physical activity (NL-1000 pedometer/accelerometers)and four-day self-reported physical activity (measured using the Multimedia Activity Recallfor Children and Adolescents [MARCA]). Secondary outcomes were exercise knowledge(purpose-designed quiz), exercise attitudes, exercise intention, exercise self-efficacy (Leap IIscales), self-reported recreational screen time (MARCA) and functional capacity (six-minutewalk test).Results Of the 118 eligible <strong>Novita</strong> clients, 41 consented <strong>to</strong> participate (mean age 13 years, range 11-16years, males=26). Chi-squared analyses and t-tests revealed that prior <strong>to</strong> the interventionthere was no significant differences between the intervention (n=20) and the control (n=21)group participants for demographic characteristics or outcome measures, with the exceptionof screen time (p=0.05). All participants attended post-intervention assessments. At followup,both groups showed a reduction in weekly pedometer counts, self-reported dailymoderate-vigorous physical activity and an increase in self-reported daily recreational screentime, suggesting a seasonal effect of the timing of the intervention (autumn/winter). Mixedmodeling analyses found no statistically significant time-by-group interactions, howeverthe pattern of changes supported the intervention group relative <strong>to</strong> the control group withmoderate effect sizes (0.43, 0.5, 0.6 and -0.46 for weekly step counts [p=0.06], weekly activeminutes [p=0.06], exercise knowledge [p=0.08] and self-reported screen time [p=0.17]respectively). Final follow-up assessments are currently being completed.
27ImplicationsFor clients – it appears that the internet is an enjoyable, accessible and effective means ofaccessing services. Adolescent clients and their families were interested in, and engagedsuccessfully in, this self-management program.For services – this study has developed a new intervention which may be used <strong>to</strong> supplementmore traditional forms of therapy.There appears <strong>to</strong> be good potential <strong>to</strong> expand this program for a wider client population and<strong>to</strong> develop other types of self-management programs for adolescent clients.StatusOngoingEvaluation of measurements, interventions, programs andclinical practice> Program<strong>Novita</strong> staff contribu<strong>to</strong>rs highlighted in boldProject titleContribu<strong>to</strong>rsFeasibility of It Takes Two To Talk® for families of children with mo<strong>to</strong>r impairmentsUK team: Dr Lindsay Penning<strong>to</strong>n, Professor Senga Bond and Dr Thomas Klee (all fromUniversity of Newcastle, UK)<strong>Novita</strong> team: Dr Parimala Raghavendra, Catherine Olsson, Lynette Rule, EmmaCols<strong>to</strong>nFundingSummary• Department of Health, National Health Service <strong>Research</strong> and Development Program, UK(fellowship <strong>to</strong> Dr Lindsay Pennig<strong>to</strong>n)• Health Foundation, UKRecently, the Hanen Early Language Parent Program, It Takes Two <strong>to</strong> Talk®, has gainedpopularity and is offered <strong>to</strong> parents of children with a wide range of developmentaldisabilities in the UK and in Australia. Hanen aims <strong>to</strong> train parents <strong>to</strong> facilitate their child’searly communication development by watching and waiting for their child’s communicationsignals and responding <strong>to</strong> build conversation from these signals, which has been associatedwith changes in interaction patterns for parents and children. However the program wasdeveloped for children with developmental disabilities and has not been validated specificallyfor the subgroup of children with mo<strong>to</strong>r impairments who have distinct and complexcommunication disorders.The study investigated the following questions:1. Is It Takes Two <strong>to</strong> Talk® associated with positive communication changes for parents andtheir children who have mo<strong>to</strong>r disorders?2. Is It Takes Two <strong>to</strong> Talk® associated with changes in the complexity of mothers’ language<strong>to</strong> their children with mo<strong>to</strong>r disorders?3. How acceptable and useful is the Hanen training <strong>to</strong> the families?