The Minutes of the 121 Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(i)(ii)Proponent shall submit the information relating to Recycle/reuse plan as perTOR point no 17 and details on green belt on the southern side of the projectsite.Proponent shall submit NOC/ Consent of GPCB issued for their company.In view of the foregoing observations, the committee recommend to defer theproposal. The proposal shall be reconsidered after the above observations are addressedand submitted.5.2 CRZ clearance for the Seawater intake & outfall system and Rail line for coaltransportation at Palavalasa, Visakhapattinam by M/s Hinduja National PowerCorporation Ltd (F. No 11-58/2011-IA-III)The project was lastly discussed by the EAC in its meeting held in January, 2013 andsought additional information viz details of the original as well as modified railway line,undertaking that there will be no construction in mudflat except part of railway line on stiltand to maintain the existing vegetation cover in the area between HTL and 500m line whichis approximately 180 acres, belonging to government, located adjacent to the project area, inconsultation with the State Government. Proponent submitted the details and an undertaking.During the discussion, the following points emerged:i) Shall maintain the existing vegetation cover in the area between HTL and500m line which is approximately 180 acres, belonging to government,located adjacent to the project area, in consultation with the StateGovernment and there shall be no industrial development within this area ascommitted.ii)iii)The railway line has been shifted from mud flat area and as per the modifiedline only 160 m is within mudflat area as against the original plan on 1500m.Railway line in CRZ area shall be on stilt.There shall be no construction in mudflat except part of railway line on stilt ascommitted.The Committee recommended the project for grant of CRZ clearance with the abovecondition in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.5.3 Environmental Clearance for the construction of Common Effluent TreatmentPlant (CETP) at Village JamalpurAwana, PanchayatJamalpurAwana, TalukLudhiana East, Ludhiana District, Punjab by M/s. Punjab Dyers Association[F.No.10-92/2010-IA.III]The proposal was examined by the EAC in its meeting held on 10 th – 11 st May, 2012& 8 th -9 th November, 2012 and committee noted that as per the proponent the irrigationdepartment is working on a proposal to use the treated water for about 33,454 acres of lands
of about 35 villages. Committee sought the supporting documents on this proposal. Thedetails submitted by the proponent were examined by the Committee. It was noted that theirrigation department proposal is for use of treated sewage and not for the treated effluentfrom the proposed CETP. However, the Punjab Pollution control Board clarified that it isenvisaged to used the treated effluent from the proposed CETP as well.During the discussion, the following points emerged:(i)(ii)(iii)Consent order shall be obtained from Pollution Control Board. The PCB shallensure the treatability of Boron, Sodium Absorption Ration (SAR) andphenolic Compounds to meet the standards for agriculture use.There shall be no discharge into Budha nallah.The farmers shall be made aware that the water is treated effluent.The Committee recommended the project for grant of Environmental clearancewith the condition suggested in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the projectproponent.5.4 Environment and CRZ Clearance for the proposed Multipurpose Terminal andShip Repair Facility at Village Change Dist. Raigad. Maharashtra By M/s. KaranjaTerminals & Logistics Private Limited (F.No. 11-59/2010-IA.III)The project was lastly discussed by the EAC in its meeting held in December, 2012and sought additional information viz proposed plan for the mangrove protection, bufferzone, development along with map for the existing mangroves available at the site includingtheir GPS coordinates, various issues raised during the public hearing in a tabular form. Thedetails submitted by nthe proponent were examined in details.During the discussion, the following points emerged:(i) There shall not be any construction in mangrove areas including 50 mtsmangroves buffer area. Mangrove development and conservation plan shall becarried out as committed. The proponent should submit the progress onmangrove development plan along with six-monthly monitoring reports.(ii)(iv)(iv)(v)(vi)All the responses/assurance made during the public hearing shall be compliedstrictly.Periodical shore line monitoring shall be carried out and details shall besubmitted along with six-monthly reports.The development and operation of the port shall not cause any disturbance tothe fishing activity.The dredge material shall be used for reclamation /disposed in the identifiedsites. However, the proponent shall carryout chemical characteristics beforedisposal / using it for reclamation to ensure its suitability and prevent anylikely impact.Oil Contingency Management Plan shall be put in place.
Page 5 and 6: 100% steam requirement and approxim
Page 7 and 8: As presented by the project propone
Page 10 and 11: (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)(viii)(
Page 12 and 13: of the road is 75.650 km. The propo
Page 14 and 15: During the discussion, the followin
Page 16 and 17: (xiv)(xv)(xvi)Site justification of
Page 18 and 19: The project road starts from Lalsot
Page 20 and 21: (i) The project road falls within 1
Page 22 and 23: Public hearing to be conducted for
Page 24 and 25: (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)The project propone
Page 26 and 27: (xiii)(xiv)(xv)(xvi)Submit Roles an
Page 30 and 31: (vii)(viii)(ix)(x)Hazardous materia
Page 32 and 33: include petrol station/service cent
Page 34 and 35: (xxxiv)Detailed R&R plan with data
Page 36: 121 st Meeting of the Expert Apprai

The Minutes of the 121 Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?