court of appeal for ontario - academicfreedom.ca

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Examination No. 12-0477.2 Court File No. 11-51657 B E T W E E N: SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE JOANNE ST. LEWIS - and - DENIS RANCOURT ********************** (Ottawa-Carleton) PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT CROSS-EXAMINATION OF ALLAN ROCK on an Affidavit dated February 21, 2012, pursuant to an appointment made on consent of the parties, to be reported by Gillespie Reporting Services, on April 18, 2012, commencing at the hour of 2:00 in the afternoon. APPEARANCES: *********************** MS. A. SEMENOVA for the Plaintiff PETER DOODY, ESQ. for University of Ottawa MR. DENIS RANCOURT for himself This Cross-Examination was taken in stenotype by Pauline Munro, O.C.R., at Ottawa, Ontario, having been duly sworn for the purpose.
NAME OF WITNESS: MR. ALLAN ROCK (i) INDEX CROSS-EXAMINATION BY: MR. DENIS RANCOURT NUMBER OF PAGES: 139 ADVISEMENTS, OBJECTIONS & UNDERTAKINGS *O* . . . . . . 16, 36, 37, 41, 42, 47, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58, 94, 95, 100-106,114, 115, 116-121, 123-125, 128, 129, 132, 134-138 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. 1: E-mail dated April 20th, 2009. . . . . . . . 108 EXHIBIT NO. 2: E-mail from Allan Rock dated April 19th, 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 EXHIBIT NO. A: National Post Article. . . . . . . . . . . . 120 EXHIBIT NO. B: E-mail from André Lalonde. . . . . . . . . . 121 EXHIBIT NO. C: Letter dated March 14, 2012 to Doctor Louis Morisette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 EXHIBIT NO. D: E-mail from André Dumulon to Louise Pagé- Valin and others, January 30, 2009. . . . . . . . . . . 139 DATE TRANSCRIPT ORDERED: APRIL 18, 2012 DATE TRANSCRIPT COMPLETED: APRIL 20, 2012
Page 1 and 2:
BETWEEN: Introduction ONTARIO SUPER
Page 3 and 4:
Costs should not be awarded to the
Page 5 and 6:
Order requested 22. The Defendant r
Page 7 and 8:
TAB 1
Page 9 and 10:
ancourtlibelcasecomment http://civi
Page 11 and 12: - .1 ''l APPEARANCES: on Mr. R. Dea
Page 13 and 14: pornt. 68. Submissions - Mr L-/CClI
Page 15 and 16: 10 rul ,tl '"1 I .^l t 93. Submissr
Page 17 and 18: 136. Reasons for Decision - Master
Page 19 and 20: TAB 3
Page 21 and 22: [6] When Hilltop learned of the tra
Page 23 and 24: [19] On June 20, 2002 Greer J. gave
Page 25 and 26: [201] If I am wrong in my analysis
Page 27 and 28: $2,366,350.00 mortgage against the
Page 29 and 30: the earlier action; (c) the cause o
Page 33 and 34: (i) any other matter relevant to th
Page 35 and 36: COSTS ON SETTLEMENT 57.04 Where a p
Page 39 and 40: - 2 - Indian Band, and David Anthon
Page 41 and 42: - 21 - 20 In the usual case, costs
Page 43 and 44: - 23 - 24 Similarly, in Skidmore v.
Page 45 and 46: - 25 - treated as an unlimited sour
Page 49 and 50: May. 9. 2012 l:2lPl\4 No. 1695 P. 9
Page 51 and 52: Mlay, 9 2012 l:2lPl\4 No, 1695 P 11
Page 53 and 54: lvlay. 9, 2012 1r22Pl\4 No. 1695 P
Page 55 and 56: jav. 9 2012 l:19PM Iro. 1695 P 2/14
Page 57 and 58: ,v1ay, 9. 2012 l:19PM No, 1695 P 4/
Page 59 and 60: May, 9. 2012 l:20P[1 No, 1695 P 6/
Page 61: TAB 7
Page 65 and 66: 1 A. I've answered your question. 2
Page 67 and 68: 1 A. No. 2 186 Q. None? 3 A. No. 4
Page 71 and 72: constitute an improper motive or of
Page 73 and 74: Class Proceedings Act. In these ins
Page 77 and 78: Statute or Rule Governing Place of
show all

court of appeal for ontario - academicfreedom.ca

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?