17.08.2012 Views

Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung Internet-Supplement ...

Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung Internet-Supplement ...

Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung Internet-Supplement ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Richard Croucher<br />

BzG-<strong>Supplement</strong> No. 1/2000 15<br />

1996, pp.24670 and p.268. Dartmann contends that ‘The TUC did not institutionalise any links with<br />

the German unions apart from fraternal attendance at Congresses, invitations to the newly emergent<br />

international bodies or the Trade Union Marshall Plan conference, or individual relief actions...’ (p.246)<br />

Having somewhat un<strong>der</strong>mined his initial assertion by providing evidence of links, Dartmann dealt with<br />

the appointment of Gottfurcht as liaison officer by saying that it was ‘the only concrete attempt.....the<br />

effectiveness of which was doomed to be very limited from the start, though’ but without explaining<br />

why he consi<strong>der</strong>ed it so ‘doomed’. (p.246) Dartmann’s view of Gottfurcht’s work differs from that taken<br />

by Boeckler (see note 8 below) and Tewson (see note 19 below). Dartmann also argued that those<br />

parts of the Allied Control Commission for Germany concerned with economic matters were more<br />

creative in developing codetermination than Manpower Division. (p.268).<br />

7 Law 22 is examined in P.Weiler, British Labour and the Cold War, Stanford University Press, Stanford:<br />

1988, p. 167.<br />

8 Tewson to Gottfurcht, 4 June, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12. All documents referred to are from the TUC’s<br />

archive deposited in the Mo<strong>der</strong>n Records Centre, University of Warwick and are prefixed ‘MRC’. In September<br />

1947, Tewson and Boeckler had a long conversation when the latter visited the TUC Congress<br />

in Southport, during which the latter expressed ‘consi<strong>der</strong>able satisfaction’ with Gottfurcht’s liaison work<br />

between the two movements. [Tewson to Bell, 18 September, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12]<br />

9 Gottfurcht’s Report on Germany, May, 1949. MRC: 292/943/118.<br />

10 514/PC/10: ‘Law No.22-Works Council’, 28 February, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12. Property Control<br />

remained in control of many important enterprises as late as 1951. (Public Record Office [PRO]: FO<br />

1023/342)<br />

11 Kenny to Carthy, 20 May, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

12 IR Branch Monthly Bulletin, 47/2. PRO: FO 1051/433.<br />

13 Luce to Gottfurcht, 26 June, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

14 The speech had explained that British policy had been to obtain a sound growth from below, and that<br />

although this had resulted in a large number of small unions, Luce would not intervene to prevent larger<br />

bodies being formed. He encouraged the creation of a co-ordinating body. ‘Speech made by Mr. R.W.<br />

Luce to the Trade Union Zonal Council at Bielefeld on 4 October, 1946’. MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

15 Gottfurcht to Luce, 7 July, 1947. MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

16 Gottfurcht’s Report of May 1949. MRC:292/943/118.<br />

17 Gottfurcht thanked Ernest Bell and Albert Carthy of the TUC’s International Department, as well as<br />

Tewson and Walter Citrine, General Secretary and ex-General Secretary of the TUC respectively, in a<br />

letter informing them that he had been successful in his application for British nationality: ‘To express<br />

my gratitude to all of you is my deep-felt desire at this juncture’. Gottfurcht to Bell, 11 February, 1948.<br />

MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

18 M. Schnei<strong>der</strong>, op.cit., p.259.<br />

19 R. Steininger, op.cit., pp. 69-90.<br />

Steininger’s view that ‘die Briten’ of the TUC and Foreign Office need hardly be differentiated between<br />

has been challenged by evidence produced by Weiler, who shows that the Foreign Office complained<br />

in late 1947 that the TUC was giving insufficient active support to the Foreign Office in its attempts to<br />

combat both Communist and American Fe<strong>der</strong>ation of Labour influence in Germany.(P. Weiler, op.cit.,<br />

p.178). D. McShane, op.cit., p.226.<br />

20 D. McShane, op.cit., p.219.<br />

21 Gottfurcht’s report of May 1949. MRC: 292/943/118.<br />

22 Tewson to Rosenberg, 18 March, 1950. MRC: 292/943/17. Gottfurcht was succeeded as liaison officer<br />

by his old colleague Richard Broh, who held the position for much of the 1950s.<br />

23 Gottfurcht to Boeckler, 27 January, 1950. MRC: 292/943/12.<br />

24 Sir Thomas Hutton to Sir Vincent Tewson, 13 March, 1953. MRC: 242/943/18. The German employers’<br />

attitudes on this occasion seem to support Gottfurcht’s view of them as fundamentally hostile to cooperation<br />

with trade unions.<br />

25 Tewson to Hutton, 14 March, 1952. MRC: 242/943/18.<br />

ends

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!