12.07.2015 Views

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Reasonable</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Expense</strong>s: Discussion papercases where multiple, conflicting treatments <strong>of</strong> transactions are permittedby accounting. 175In certain instances, 176 where required or authorised by law, 177 taxtreatment departs from the accounting treatment <strong>of</strong> items <strong>of</strong> revenue,expenses, income and capital. 178 Tax law is not alone in this variance withaccounting practice: economic income approaches, though sharing similarroots with accounting income approaches, 179 significantly differ 180 fromaccounting income and its increasingly pervasive comprehensive incomeapproaches (for instance, those underpinning ‘fair value’ accounting). <strong>The</strong>insights derived from more fundamental (and indeed, more relevant fromthe perspective <strong>of</strong> the tax deductibility <strong>of</strong> expenses) economic concepts<strong>of</strong> income are considered in the next section.3.3. ECONOMIC INCOME AND THE DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXPENSES3.3.1. INTRODUCTIONWhile accounting concepts have influenced jurists, economic theories onincome have had great impact on tax policymakers in the design <strong>of</strong>appropriate tax bases and policies. Income, however, is a rather elusiveconcept, meaning various things to different people for diverse purposes.<strong>The</strong> ideas to which income corresponds range from tangible cash andmoney (net) receipts from economic activity to more ephemeral concepts<strong>of</strong> economic utility or psychological satisfaction. <strong>The</strong> search for an175176177178179180See Gallagher v Jones [1993] STC 537. See also Willingale v InternationalCommercial Bank Ltd [1978] STC 75 and Pattison v Marine Midland Ltd.[1981] STC 540.For instance, in the deductibility <strong>of</strong> expenses under the rules for wholly andexclusively incurred expenses and business entertainment expenditure: seeJohn Tiley, Revenue Law, op cit, p. 398.See §42 Finance Act 1988 and §25 ITTOIA 2005.John Tiley, Revenue Law, op cit, p. 398.In the foundational concept <strong>of</strong> income: see Kevin Holmes, (2000) <strong>The</strong>Concept <strong>of</strong> Income: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, IBFD Doctoral Series Vol.1, IBFD Publications BV, chapter 4.Kevin Holmes, (2000) <strong>The</strong> Concept <strong>of</strong> Income: A Multidisciplinary Analysis,ibid, chapter 3.Bode OyetundePage 32 <strong>of</strong> 63PhD CandidateCentre for Commercial Law StudiesQueen Mary & Westfield College

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!