12.07.2015 Views

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

Reasonable Business Expense - The Chartered Institute of Taxation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Reasonable</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Expense</strong>s: Discussion paper4.2. DISSECTION AND THE REASONABLE BUSINESS EXPENSES RULE<strong>The</strong> ‘but for’ reasonable business expenses rule could be used to expandthe scope <strong>of</strong> dissection <strong>of</strong> aggregate yet discrete mixed purposestransactions, such that those expenses that are properly attributed tobusiness purposes may be properly deducted. <strong>The</strong> decision in Watkis(Inspector <strong>of</strong> Taxes) v Ashford Sparkes & Harward 207 illustrates a feasibleapproach to implementing the reasonable business expenses rule. Here,the court considered mixed expenses on food and accommodation anddissected the deductible business elements in a series <strong>of</strong> expenses fromnon-deductible private expenses. In this case, a firm <strong>of</strong> solicitors soughtto deduct 208 the following expenses: the cost <strong>of</strong> meals taken at weekly orfortnightly lunch meetings where the firm’s business was discussed bythe partners; the cost <strong>of</strong> meals at evening plenary meetings at <strong>of</strong>fice orhotel locations where the partners further discussed the firm’s affairs;expenditure attributable to the partners on meals and accommodation atan annual weekend conference attended by the partners and theirfamilies; and the contribution towards accommodation for a regionalsolicitors’ conference attended by the firm’s partners. Nourse, J appliedthe House <strong>of</strong> Lords’ decision in Mallalieu v Drummond (Inspector <strong>of</strong>Taxes) . 209 <strong>The</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> food and drink at the firm’s lunchmeetings, dinner meetings and the solicitors’ conference would haveoccurred irrespective <strong>of</strong> any meetings, as these were provided at timeswhen lunch and dinner meals would have been eaten anyway. Althoughthe business purpose might be the predominant purpose, it was not the20720820958 TC 468; [1985] STC 451; [1985] WLR 994; [1985] 2 All ER 916.<strong>The</strong> Commissioner held the relevant expenditure was deductible, beingwholly and exclusively laid out for the pr<strong>of</strong>ession.[1983] STC 665, HL.Bode OyetundePage 40 <strong>of</strong> 63PhD CandidateCentre for Commercial Law StudiesQueen Mary & Westfield College

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!