Consultant physicians working with patients 5th edition - FSEM
Consultant physicians working with patients 5th edition - FSEM
Consultant physicians working with patients 5th edition - FSEM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Consultant</strong> <strong>physicians</strong> <strong>working</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>patients</strong><br />
developed an infrastructure through which the research<br />
active physician should be able to contribute to this<br />
vision. Despite this, challenges remain. Cultural changes<br />
in the NHS place an increasing emphasis on clinical<br />
service over teaching and research.<br />
The potentially conflicting demands of employers (eg<br />
NHS, universities, industry and grant-awarding bodies),<br />
those who fund research (eg national awarding bodies<br />
and charities), and training and regulatory institutions<br />
(eg royal colleges, and the GMC) need to be reconciled.<br />
The move towards a consultant-delivered clinical<br />
service and the workload relating to clinical governance,<br />
revalidation and CPD may mandate new ways of<br />
<strong>working</strong>; and achieving a balance between clinical and<br />
academic training, and geographical mobility will be<br />
needed.<br />
Through a series of <strong>working</strong> parties and associated<br />
publications, the Academic Medicine Committee<br />
(AMC) of the RCP has attempted to address these issues.<br />
First, it has held workshops and published position<br />
papers concerning routes of entry and training systems<br />
in academic medicine. 25 The need for a transparent<br />
career structure up to and including properly structured<br />
and supported consultant posts has also been debated. 26<br />
Second, the AMC has been an integral part of the RCP’s<br />
Medicines Forum, leading the work stream relating to<br />
translational research. Specifically it has identified ways<br />
in which the RCP can act as a link between national<br />
agencies and the research active physician, thereby<br />
facilitating the UK research agenda. Finally, the AMC<br />
has provided evidence to a number of investigations,<br />
consultations and reports, the most significant of which<br />
has been the 2011 report of the Academy of Medical<br />
Sciences into the burden of regulation impacting on UK<br />
research and clinical trials. 27<br />
Summary<br />
The context of clinical practice has changed rapidly<br />
since the millennium and is set to change further.<br />
Revalidation, changes in medical education and<br />
research, and the expansion of the potential portfolio of<br />
the consultant coupled <strong>with</strong> a move towards a<br />
consultant-delivered service and service<br />
reconfiguration, pose challenges and unrivalled<br />
opportunities. There is a need for clinical leadership in<br />
management, quality improvement and commissioning<br />
and planning of services.<br />
12<br />
Better planning, support, education and training of the<br />
consultant workforce are now needed to ensure that we<br />
can positively influence these changes and ensure that<br />
patient care not only remains at the centre of our<br />
endeavours but continues to improve.<br />
References<br />
1 Royal College of Physicians. Leading for quality: the<br />
foundation for healthcare over the next decade. 2010.<br />
www.rcplondon.ac.uk/policy/responding-nhs-reform/<br />
leading-quality<br />
2 Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society: medical<br />
professionalism in a changing world.Reportofa<strong>working</strong><br />
party. London: RCP, 2005.<br />
3 Royal College of Physicians. Future <strong>physicians</strong>: changing<br />
doctors in changing times. London: RCP, 2010.<br />
4 WanlessD. Securing our future health: taking a long term<br />
view. London: HM Treasury, 2002.<br />
5 MarmotReviewTeam.Fair society: healthy lives. The<br />
marmot review. London: Marmot Review, 2010. www.<br />
marmotreview.org.<br />
6 Royal College of Physicians. A strategy for quality: 2011<br />
and beyond. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/policy/improvinghealthcare/rcp-strategy-for-quality.<br />
7 Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating<br />
the NHS. London: DH, 2010.<br />
8 Royal College of Physicians. Care closer to home.<br />
www.rcplondon.ac.uk/resources/clinical-resources/carecloser-home.<br />
9 Department of Health. Ourhealth,ourcare,oursay:a<br />
new direction for community services. London: DH, 2006.<br />
10 Tooke J. Aspiring to excellence: final report of the<br />
independent inquiry into modernising medical careers.<br />
London: MMC Inquiry, 2008.<br />
11 Smith J. The Shipman Inquiry: fifth report. Safeguarding<br />
<strong>patients</strong>: lessons from the past – proposals for the future.<br />
London: Department of Health, 2004.<br />
12 Chief medical officer. Good doctors, safer <strong>patients</strong>.<br />
London: Department of Health, 2006.<br />
13 Department of Health. Trust, assurance and safety: the<br />
regulation of health professionals. London:DH,<br />
2007.<br />
14 Medical revalidation – principles and next steps: the report<br />
of the Chief Medical Officer for England’s Working Group,<br />
July 2008. www.dh.gov.uk<br />
15 General Medical Council. Revalidation: a statement of<br />
intent. October 2010. www.gmc-uk.org<br />
16 National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and<br />
Death. Elective and emergency surgery in the elderly: an<br />
age old problem. 2010. www.ncepod.org.uk<br />
17 Lewis G (ed). Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries<br />
(CMACE). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal<br />
death to make motherhood safer. The Eighth Report of the<br />
C○ Royal College of Physicians 2011