Commonwealth Science Industry <strong>Research</strong> Organisation, Geoscience Australia andDefence Science Technology Organisation.This report summarises research programs and studies conducted in these marineparks over their five-year zoning plan review period (<strong>2002</strong>–2007). A full list of allrelevant research projects in the marine parks within this period is presented in Section7, and a list of publications directly relevant to these marine parks, including thosepublished before <strong>2002</strong>, is available at www.mpa.nsw.gov.au.The intention of this report is to summarise research projects (both MPA and external)conducted within these two marine parks that are considered relevant to their zoningreview. The report indicates the direction and type of research conducted from <strong>2002</strong> to<strong>2009</strong>, since the last overviews were carried out by the MPA (NSW MPA 2000, Zann2000, NSW MPA 2001).Many of the described projects have built on research conducted before <strong>2002</strong>, but suchresearch is generally not detailed in this report. A broader description is found in therelated reports Natural values of the Solitary Islands <strong>Marine</strong> Park (NSW MPA 2008a)and Natural values of the Jervis Bay <strong>Marine</strong> Park (NSW MPA 2008b).Further details of many earlier studies in Solitary Islands <strong>Marine</strong> Park region are alsopresented in Rule et al (2007), and in the Jervis Bay <strong>Marine</strong> Park in Breen et al (2005).A number of projects that aim to provide information relevant to the zoning review arefound within the Solitary Islands <strong>Marine</strong> Park and Jervis Bay <strong>Marine</strong> Park Zoning PlanReview Reports.Several other reports or manuscripts, in conjunction with this report, provide specificinformation relevant to zoning reviews for these marine parks. These are:Malcolm, HA, Smith, SDA, Jordan A (2010). Using patterns of reef fish assemblages torefine a Habitat Classification System for marine parks in NSW, Australia. AquaticConservation: <strong>Marine</strong> and Freshwater EcosystemsMalcolm HA, Jordan A, Smith SDA (in press). Biogeographical and cross-shelf patternsof reef fish assemblages in a transition zone, <strong>Marine</strong> BiodiversityNSW MPA (2010). Mapping of seabed habitats in the Solitary Islands and Jervis Bay<strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>.This report is structured around the research categories identified in the NSW <strong>Marine</strong><strong>Parks</strong> Strategic <strong>Research</strong> Plan 2005–2010, although it is recognised that someresearch projects may fit under more than one category. A brief description of availablestudy or studies and findings are provided. The principal researcher/s and theiraffiliation are listed for all studies described in this report (see Appendices).2 Solitary Island and Jervis Bay <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s <strong>Summaries</strong> <strong>2002</strong>–<strong>2009</strong>
2. Biodiversity and ecological processesThe primary criteria for establishing marine parks in Australia are that they contain acomprehensive, adequate and representative selection of marine biodiversity.Comprehensiveness is the extent of the full range of ecosystems and habitats in andacross all bioregions; adequacy is the degree to which the size, boundaries andlocation of marine parks are adequate to maintain biodiversity and ecological patternsand processes, particularly in relation to managing impact on such patterns andprocesses; and representativeness is a reflection of the range of biological diversity ofcommunities within ecosystems and habitats (ANZECC TFMPA 1998).To ensure zoning arrangements meet the above objectives most effectively, it isimportant to include biodiversity and ecological information when planning. In manyregions, data on biotic composition or species distribution come from surveys atindividual sites, examining communities or life-history of abundant and ofteneconomically important species. However, detailed spatial information on thedistribution of a wide range of species is generally limited. There is increasing evidencethat habitats may act as effective ‘surrogates’ for species diversity in the planningprocess, provided they are appropriately validated (Ward et al 1999), and allrepresentative habitats are included (Roff et al 2003). Therefore, mapping the extent,structure and distribution of seabed habitats can be a cost-effective method ofbiodiversity assessment.However, since biological diversity can be defined at multiple levels, habitats must bemapped and classified at levels within a hierarchical framework. In the context ofseabed mapping, the upper levels in the hierarchy are specifically delineated throughremote sensing and associated ground truthing (visual observations of the seabed toidentify or validate features mapped remotely, e.g. using swath acoustic sonar), andare commonly based on geophysical features (Zacharias et al 1998, Greene et al 1999,Roff and Taylor 2000, Bax and Williams 2001) or a combination of biological andphysical features (Allee et al 2000). Recent advances in swath acoustic methods haveallowed increased resolution and spatial coverage of the seabed and examination ofthe biophysical extent and structure of various habitats (Kostylev et al 2001, Brown etal <strong>2002</strong>, Beaman et al 2005). These advancements have led a number of seabedmapping programs in NSW providing important information on the planning andassessment of marine park zones.The zoning plans in Solitary Islands and Jervis Bay marine parks used a habitatclassification system as a surrogate for biodiversity, and this is likely to remain a keyplanning tool in NSW marine parks. However, its effectiveness will depend to someextent on how well it represents patterns of biodiversity (Gladstone <strong>2002</strong>, Smith 2005,Winberg et al 2007a). The habitat classification system primarily uses depth todifferentiate habitat types; depth has been demonstrated to strongly influenceassemblages and species in different taxonomic groups including fishes (Connell andLincoln-Smith 1999, Williams and Bax 2001) and benthic organisms (Garrabou et al<strong>2002</strong>). While depth and habitat are often closely linked, if other factors were shown tohave a strong influence, a system based solely on depth may not be an ideal planningtool. Reefs can also be classified into different ‘reef types’ based on broadgeomorphologic categories, including whether it is attached to emergent rock (e.g.headlands, islands, islets, rocks) or is fully submerged at all tides.An important component of a marine ecosystem’s biological diversity and ecologicalfunction is reef-associated fishes (Shears and Babcock <strong>2002</strong>). These fishes also havesocial, cultural and economic value, therefore are relevant for marine park planning intheir own right (Gladstone 2007). Combining information on spatial patterns ofSolitary Island and Jervis Bay <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s <strong>Summaries</strong> <strong>2002</strong>–<strong>2009</strong> 3