figures for women and for men. However, these fail totake into account the over-representation of wo menin part-time work, an area which is excluded fromunemployment statistics. In 2007, the percentageof women working part-time in the EU was 31.2%,four times higher than for men. 4 Women are also themain providers of public services, representing up totwo-thirds of the workforce in education, health andsocial care; it is therefore likely that female unemploymentwill rise disproportionately with cutbacksin public sector spending.In order to understand the effects of public spendingcuts on women, in both the short and the longterm, a gender impact analysis should be conductedbefore the cuts are made. State responses to this crisishave focused on male-dominated sectors (e.g., the carindustry or the construction sector), but reductionsin public expenditure will undoubtedly result in thetransfer of services such as caregiving back to women,further restricting their ability to fully participate in allaspects of life. Similarly the impact of expenditure cutsto support services in socio-economically disadvantagedcommunities will result in a greater reliance onwomen both within families and in the community.All over the world, women’s unemploymentrates are increasing due to outmoded gender conceptionsand cuts in public spending, while at thesame time their participation in the informal economyand in “voluntary” work has increased as socialprotection measures are removed and women areexpected to fill in the gaps.Global challenges: a quick overviewIn Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America and the MiddleEast, women’s movements have acknowledged thepositive effect of international agreements on thelives of women and girls. However, some regionsare also registering increases in religious extremismand/or right-wing conservatism that is linked to theperpetuation and propagation of discriminatory lawsagainst women. Many States and political partiesare manipulating the right of people to cultural andreligious diversity as a pretext for violating humanrights, including the rights of women, girls, peopleliving with HIV/AIDS and persons with different sexualorientations. 5 The political oppression of womenand their rights is also compounded by armed conflictand an excessive focus on militarization ratherthan human well-being as a means of security.Variations of this phenomenon are visible inAfrica and other developing regions the crises have4 European Women’s Lobby, Women and the economic crisis:the urgency of a gender perspective, <strong>2010</strong>. Available from:.5 See for example <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, Putting gender economicsat the forefront – 15 years after the IV World Conference onWomen, March <strong>2010</strong>. Available from: .reached through various channels of transmission. Ithas also become necessary to use a gender perspectiveto decode situations within households, sincepeople who share the same space have asymmetricpower relationships. 6 Moreover, despite currentchanges in social roles, the division of labour by sexwithin households is still very rigid. The limitationsplaced on women by this division of labour, as well asthe social hierarchies based on it, determine an unequalsituation within three closely-linked systems:the labour market, the welfare or social protectionsystem and the household.Latin America and the Caribbean: lackof gender policiesThe decrease in trade – both in volume and in value–, the drop in remittances and unemployment alongwith an increase in poverty are the principal negativeconsequences of the global economic crisis in LatinAmerica. Over 2 million people lost their jobs in 2009and, despite forecasts of greater economic growthin <strong>2010</strong>, those jobs will be difficult to recover. 7 Thisis compounded by the report by the EconomicCommission for Latin America and the Caribbean(ECLAC) that 2009 exports dropped by 24% as aresult of the crisis. 8So far, responses to the crisis in the region havefocused on stabilizing the financial sector and on actionsto sustain demand, employment and supportfor vulnerable populations. However, very few of themeasures taken by governments in Latin Americaand the Caribbean mention women, despite the factthat the impact of the recession is greater on them,in terms both of unemployment and of more precariouswork, with lower productivity and less socialprotection. Gender inequality needs to be takeninto account in these policies since accumulation ofprofit is not only based on the exploitation of naturalresources, but also on the basis of cheap labour,women’s labour being the cheapest of all.The production process includes, though doesnot formally acknowledge, a double burden on womenwithin the household (or “voluntary” work) andthrough lower wage jobs in order to increase profits.Over the last decade, salaries went down in most ofthe countries of the region, largely due to the inclusionof more women in the labour market.At the 10th Regional Conference on Women inLatin America and the Caribbean, in August 2007, 336 <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> Research Team, Gender and poverty: acase of entwined inequalities, 2005. Available from:.7 ILO, 2009 Labour Overview for Latin America and theCaribbean, Geneva, January <strong>2010</strong>.8 ECLAC, International trade in Latin America and theCaribbean 2009: crisis and recovery, January <strong>2010</strong>. Availablefrom: .governments approved the Quito Consensus callingfor the adoption of all needed affirmative actionmeasures and mechanisms, including legislative reformsand budgetary measures, to ensure women’sparticipation and rights. 9 The inability to enforce thecommitments made in Quito demonstrates deficienciesin gender equality policies which are linked tothe weakness of States in adopting and enforcingmechanisms for the advancement of women andto the predominance of skewed “welfare” policies,based more on charity than on human rights.At the recent 11 th Regional Conference onWomen in Latin America and the Caribbean in July<strong>2010</strong> in Brasilia, Brazil, ECLAC presented a paper thatexamines the achievements made in gender equalityand the challenges women still face in the region. 10This proposes a new social covenant to redistributethe total workload (paid and unpaid) between menand women, in order to facilitate women’s access tothe labour market. 11African region: a drop in the oceanDespite the advances in legislation geared towardsgender equity and judicial process, African womenexpressed disappointment with their Governmentsfor being quick to sign onto human rights instrumentsand endorse different policies at the internationaland regional levels but extremely slow indelivering on their commitments.The Africa NGOs Shadow <strong>Report</strong> on the Beijing+15 found that “the many practical steps taken overthe last five years are a drop in the ocean when assessedagainst the many promises made by AfricanGovernments on the fundamental issue of achievinggender equality, equity and women’s empowerment.In short, African leaders are falling far short of theexpectations of African women.” 12While State policies currently do reflect someelements of “gender equality” frameworks, on thewhole, these stop short of fully addressing issues ofwomen’s empowerment and in particular, sexual andreproductive health and rights.9 “Latin American and Caribbean countries approveQuito consensus,” 14 August 2007. Available from:.10 ECLAC, What kind of State? What kind of equality?, July<strong>2010</strong>. Available from: .11 For more on this region see: <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, “Latin Americaand the Caribbean: no solution to the crisis without genderpolicies,” <strong>2010</strong>. Available from: .12 FEMNET, “The Africa Women’s Regional Shadow <strong>Report</strong> onBeijing + 15,” 10. Available from: .Thematic reports 18 <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>
UN Women born: can it meet the policy gap challenge?Genoveva Tisheva and Barbara AdamsWomen’s organizations and groups worldwide celebrated the UN GeneralAssembly resolution, adopted on 2 July <strong>2010</strong>, to establish the UN Entity forGender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, or UN Women. This newentity will be headed by an Under-Secretary General and will consolidate andcombine into one the four existing gender-specific entities, increase operationalcapacity at the country level and have greater authority and resourcesto advance women’s empowerment and advancement.Particularly notable in the resolution are the paragraphs regarding theimportance of civil society participation in the new entity. The new organizationwill expand its operational presence at the country level includingengagement with women’s groups and other civil society organizationsinvested in gender equality and the empowerment of women.This resolution would not have happened without the strong advocacyand determined commitment of women’s movements and other civil societyorganizations over the last four years, beginning with the adoption of the2006 System-Wide Coherence Panel report on UN Reform, which includeda recommendation to establish a new entity to increase the authority, resourcesand capacity of UN work on gender equality. Recognizing the needfor a strong civil society effort to influence the shape of the new entity, manyof these groups united in the Gender Equality Architecture Reform or GEARCampaign. Charlotte Bunch, former Executive Director of the Center forWomen’s Global Leadership, a founding member of the GEAR Campaign stated:“We have high expectations for this new agency –the women’s groupsand other social justice, human rights and development organizations thatplayed a pivotal role in this effort must now work to ensure that the new bodyhas the human and financial resources necessary to succeed.”A lot depends on who the UN Secretary-General appoints to new Under-Secretary General position to head the new organization. There is generalagreement that this person must combine the vision, experience and determinationto not only expand the work of the UN entity for gender equality butto hold the other parts of the UN system accountable for advancing genderequality in all countries. This is particularly important in the current period,as both the international community and countries worldwide accelerateefforts to advance progress towards achieving the MDGs by 2015, while atthe same time confronting the ongoing impact of the worse global financialand economic crisis in 40 years.The first major challenge facing UN Women, therefore is whether itwill adopt the traditional model of multilateralism where the decisions aremade only by governments and the political process tends to water policyrecommendations. This has failed to promote sustainable development toall countries or address the “policy gap” between macroeconomic policiesand gender justice approaches. Gender equality advocates in CSOs, governmentsand UN agencies must start closing this gap, and the test for UNWomen is whether it will provide the necessary vision and leadership.The policy gapThe financial and economic crisis has challenged not only the resources fordevelopment but also the policies to make it inclusive and sustainable. Asgovernments seek to reduce their budgets and their public expenditures inthe face of the debt they have incurred to address the crisis, many of the areasin which these reductions will be felt are in the provision of social services,including education and health, which are essential for women’s empowerment.This in turn threatens to reverse the gains in women’s empowerment,not only because the services will become more limited and more expensiveto access, but also because the cuts will increase the unpaid labour of womenin making up for them through what is known as the “care economy,” basedon the incorrect assumption that women are by nature dedicated to care andthat they have the time and capacity to provide it.At the same time, it is these sectors in which women’s employmentis most concentrated, thereby adding to women’s job losses, based on theassumption that if governments reduce spending on public services, andinstead subsidize private sector initiatives, the private sector will step upprovide them, thereby creating jobs for both men and women. This assumesnot only sustained demand, despite the loss of household income andimposition of new fees, but also that the main source of household incomeis men’s employment, while women’s earnings are secondary. This at atime when the UN has affirmed – and the MDG targets reflect – that the keystrategy with regard to reducing poverty is providing full, productive anddecent employment, especially for women and youth. Policy responses tothe economic crisis are in many cases perpetuating all of these outdated anddiscredited assumptions, thus disproportionately disadvantaging womenand enhancing the policy gap.This and other reports have stressed the need for developing countries’governments, which had no part in causing this crisis, to be allowed sufficientpolicy space to expand fiscal policy to respond to it, in order to promoteemployment and protect social spending. In response, international lendinginstitutions, such as the IMF and World Bank, have indicated a greaterwillingness to support more flexible fiscal policies and continued socialspending, at least in some cases. What is most urgently needed therefore, isconcerted efforts by civil society, including women’s organizations, to makesure governments take that space, in ways that protect the rights and promotethe well-being of all sectors of their societies. This is the new directionthat the new gender entity, UN Women, must inspire and lead.The GEAR network of women’s and civil society organizations and networksis contacting UN representatives at all levels to work with the transitionprocess and assure the new Under-Secretary-General of their readiness to supportthe new entity to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment.“We know that this is only the beginning,” said Rachel Harris of the Women’sEnvironment and Development Organization (WEDO). “We must continue toensure that we are building a United Nations that really works for all women onthe ground. This requires the active engagement of all stakeholders.” nIn the context of the global economic and financialcrisis, the first people to lose jobs in the formalsector in Africa have been those at the lower levels,and the majority of these are women. Women stillremain largely invisible in the formal economy, andwomen’s unpaid labour continues to be unrecognizedand increasing as they are forced to shoulder the socialand economic impact of macroeconomic policies.Feminist economists have repeatedly noted thatgendered impacts of the global crisis have increasedwithin a political context that impinges upon the timeburdens of women and forces women to absorb additionalcare burdens as market-based services orpublic services become less accessible. This contextalso includes higher unemployment rates for women<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>19Gender in times of crisis