JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8
JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8
JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>JUSTICE</strong> <strong>MUDGAL</strong> <strong>IPL</strong> <strong>PROBE</strong> <strong>COMMITTEE</strong> 2014CHAPTER IANSWERS TO THE REFERENCES9The terms of reference contain 2 questions. However, boththe questions complement each other and substantiallyoverlap. There would therefore be a consolidated answer toboth the parts of reference. For convenience, the referencewould be discussed under the following heads:I. The position of Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan in <strong>IPL</strong>team, Chennai Super Kings;II.The allegations of betting in the <strong>IPL</strong> matches againstMr. Gurunath Meiyappan;III. Allegation of spot fixing against Mr. GurunathMeiyappan;IV. The allegation of betting and spot fixing in the <strong>IPL</strong>matches against the players of <strong>IPL</strong> team, RajasthanRoyals;V. The allegation of betting against Mr. Raj Kundra,owner of Jaipur <strong>IPL</strong> Cricket Private Limited,franchisee of the <strong>IPL</strong> team Rajasthan Royals.