12.07.2015 Views

JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>JUSTICE</strong> <strong>MUDGAL</strong> <strong>IPL</strong> <strong>PROBE</strong> <strong>COMMITTEE</strong> 201462B. The Delhi Police did not record the statement of Mr.Raj Kundra, either under Section 164 Cr.P.C. orunder Section 18 of MCOCA. No explanation forthis failure was forthcoming. After about 20 days, allinformations pertaining to Mr. Raj Kundra weretransmitted to the Commissioner of Police, Jaipur.(iii) Role of Jaipur PoliceA. The information pertaining to Mr Raj Kundra wasforwarded by the Delhi Police to the Commissionerof Police, Jaipur on 25.06.2013. No fruitfulinvestigation was carried out in this connection bythe Jaipur police.B. Md. Abdi had filed a written complaint in the matterof match fixing between <strong>IPL</strong> teams, Chennai SuperKings and Rajasthan Royals played on 12.05.2013at Jaipur. The complaint was filed before the Courtof competent jurisdiction, which forwarded the saidcomplaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. toJyotinagar police station wherein case no 269/2013u/s 420/120B IPC was registered. No record hasbeen placed before the Committee to show that anyworthwhile investigation was carried out in this caseas well and the serious allegations made thereinpossibly remain un-investigated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!