JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE 201434(d) There are intercepted voice calls to show that thefixers appreciated the efforts of S. Sreesanth despitethe fact that he gave one run less and thereforedecided not to ask for refund of the advance of Rs.10 Lakhs.(e) In the first week of May 2013, accused P. JijuJanardhanan received 10 Lakhs in cash, on behalfof S. Sreesanth as an illegal consideration for spotfixing from accused Chandresh Patel @ Chand. Withthis cash, S. Sreesanth purchased 2 mobiles fromJaipur and further gave them to his two girlfriendsnamely Sakshi Jhala and Deepika both resident ofJaipur, which were subsequently recovered by DelhiPolice from them at his instance. Further, there areintercepted call records between S. Sreesanth andaccused P. Jiju Janardhanan, where the amount ofRs. 10 Lakhs received as advance for spot fixinghasbeen discussed out of which Rs 3 Lakhs went toaccused P. Jiju Janardhanan and Rs. 7 Lakhs to S.Sreesanth. The intercepted calls also shownegotiation by accused P. Jiju Janardhnan on S.Sreesanth’s behalf for fixing in future matches withbookies namely Manan and Chand.(f) There is also an intercepted voice call betweenaccused Chandresh Patel @ Chand and a bookie,which shows that accused/fixer Chandresh Patel @Chand was having full control over accused Ajith