JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

Recommendations

Info

JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE 20145either the Operational Rules or any other Regulation of theIPL.Pending the inquiry led by the two Judges Commission, aPIL Petition No. 55 of 2013 titled ‘Cricket Association ofBihar Vs BCCI amongst others’ came to be filed in theHon’ble High Court of Bombay challenging the constitutionof the two Judges Commission appointed by the BCCI toprobe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPLby Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan, son in law of Mr. N.Srinivasan and Jaipur IPL Cricket Private Limited.The Hon’ble Bombay High Court, vide its Judgement dated30.07.2013 held the constitution of the Commission to beultra vires to the BCCI regulations and the OperationalRules. The Hon’ble High Court however, declined theprayer made by the Cricket Association of Bihar, thePetitioner, to grant a further relief sought, to constitute apanel of retired Judges to conduct an enquiry against Mr.Gurunath Meiyappan, owners of Chennai Super Kings andJaipur IPL Cricket Private Limited with regard to theiralleged involvement in spot fixing and betting and left it tothe discretion of BCCI to constitute a fresh probecommission under Section 6 of the Operational Rules, if itdeemed fit.Against the Judgement dated 30.07.2013 of the Hon’bleHigh Court of Bombay in PIL Petition No. 55/2013, an SLPCivil No. 26633/2013 came to be preferred before theHon’ble Supreme Court of India.
JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE 20146The Hon’ble Supreme Court, without casting aspersions onthe two Judges Commission and on consideration of thefact that the Mumbai Police had submitted its charge sheetagainst Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan, constituted the presentthree member Probe Committee (hereinafter referred to asthe Committee) headed by Mr. Justice Mukul Mudgal,retired Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana HighCourt vide its Order dated 08.10.2013 with a view toconduct an independent probe into the allegations whichwere the subject matter of PIL Petition No. 55/2013.The other members of the Committee comprised of:1. Mr. L. Nageswar Rao, Senior Advocate and AdditionalSolicitor General of India as Member;2. Mr. Nilay Dutta, Senior Advocate as Member.TERMS OF REFERENCEThe terms of reference of the Committee for investigationas directed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court were as follows:1. The allegations of betting and spot fixing in the IPLmatches against Gurunath Meiyappan, allegedly theTeam Principal of Chennai Super Kings, 3 rdRespondent (India Cements Limited), and the playersand the 4 th Respondent (Jaipur IPL Cricket privateLimited) / team owner of IPL franchisee RajasthanRoyals.
Page 1 and 2: 2014JUSTICE MUDGALIPL PROBE COMMITT
Page 3 and 4: JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE
Page 5: JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE
Page 57 and 58:
JUSTICE MUDGAL IPL PROBE COMMITTEE
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
show all

JUSTICE-MUDGAL-IPL-PROBE-COMMITTEE-REPORT-final-feb-8

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?