29.11.2012 Views

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which would allow for joint decision-making and shared costs of<br />

any flood control projects which were initiated.<br />

Under these acts the states were required to provide, without cost<br />

to the.federal government, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way;<br />

to hold and save the United States free from damages due to<br />

construction works; to maintain and operate the works after<br />

completion; and to provide tax reimbursement to affected towns.<br />

The federal government would provide funds for the cost of<br />

construction and build the necessary dams. Also, the cost for<br />

relocation of public utilities, power lines, bridges, roads, and<br />

public buildings was to be incurred by the federal government to<br />

reduce costs to the states (compact covering flood control, 1937).<br />

Two reservoirs were suggested by the study group from the Corps<br />

of Engineers for flood protection along the Merrimack, the Blackwater<br />

Reservoir and the Franklin Falls Reservoir. The benefits derived<br />

from these projects would be primarily for flood protection, but<br />

benefits might also be derived from other uses of the reservoir,<br />

•<br />

such as water conservation, storage, and possible power output.<br />

The projected annual saving from flood loss for the state of New<br />

Hampshire would be $426,000.00 per year and $274,000.00 for<br />

Massachusetts. The "Initial Plan for Flood Control on the Merrimack<br />

River Flood Commission at a conference held in Hartford, Connecticut.<br />

In accordance with the compact formed between New Hampshire and<br />

Massachusetts covering flood control along the Merrimack River,<br />

the costs of the lands, easements, rights-of-way necessary for<br />

construction, maintenance, and tax reimbursements would be shared<br />

equally. The total cost of lands to be acquired for the two<br />

reservoirs was approximately $2,285,000.00. The total cost of<br />

maintenance per year was estimated to be $24,000.00 of which<br />

$10,000.00 was to be allocated for tax reimbursement to the towns<br />

affected by the project.<br />

The total cost of the project including construction, lands and<br />

lost tax value for the Blackwater Reservoir near Webster, New<br />

Hampshire, would be $899,000.00, and for the Franklin Falls<br />

Reservoir the entire cost was estimated to be $6,612,000.00<br />

The Blackwater project would impound 6.9 inches of runoff from its<br />

125 square miles of drainage area--equal to 16% of the drainage<br />

area of the Contoocook River. Protection offered by the Franklin<br />

Falls Reservoir would have a capacity of 3.19 inches of runoff<br />

from 1,000 square miles of drainage area. This is equal to about<br />

20% of the total drainage area of the Merrimack River or about<br />

26% of the total drainage area at Nashua, 35% at Manchester, and<br />

42% of the area at Concord. This reservoir combined with the<br />

Blackwater Reservoir would eliminate most of the flood damages in<br />

downstream urban-industrial areas.<br />

Besides the actual monetary costs in the years ahead, there would<br />

be a social cost which would be absorbed by the residents of Hill<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!