29.11.2012 Views

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

; SP- IWR° CONTRACT REPORT 78-4... , UNDER ... - IWR - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

flow through the town. A commercial zone was placed along an<br />

access road off the major highway; thus, the stores could be<br />

utilized by the local residents without crossing any major roads,<br />

and at the same time, business from tourists or any passersby could<br />

be maintained. The total street area of the village had been<br />

shortened from two and one-half to one-quarter mile, which reduced<br />

the cost of maintenance. All service mains and conduits were<br />

placed beneath a grass strip between the road and sidewalk;<br />

therefore, any repairs.or work could be conducted without- destroying<br />

existing pavement. Fire hydrants were placed intermittently,<br />

hence minimizing insurance rates.<br />

A buffer zone, running along both sides of the major highway,<br />

afforded protection from traffic and noise and was set aside as<br />

part of town land. Also, each house abutted a green belt. to allow<br />

for the maximum amount of privacy. . .<br />

To insure the continuance of these amenities and to reduce the<br />

possibility of capricious development, zoning ordinances were<br />

passed to protect the new village from unplanned or rapid growth.<br />

The design of each new home in the village had to be approved by<br />

the zoning board (originally performed by-the Hill Village Improvement<br />

Association). A minimum value for new houses_of $2,000 (today,<br />

value would be $20,000 to $30,000) was imposed. Setback requirements<br />

from streets (25 feet) and 'side lines (20 feet) were approved, and<br />

the overall planned density was one - family per acre. To prevent<br />

speculation, anyone buying a lot in the new village was required<br />

to begin construction within one year after purchase. The water<br />

system had been designed to serve the number of lots of land out<br />

in the new village. This placed an upper limit on future population<br />

growth in the village.<br />

• The spatial arrangement of Hill residents after and before relocation<br />

are illustrated in Figures 3 and <strong>4.</strong> The numbers appearing on each<br />

lot site correspond to particular individuals. Numbers greater<br />

than 35 represent those persons who had rented in the old village.<br />

. .<br />

A pattern of neighbors in the old village selecting adjacent lots<br />

in th0 new village does not appear. Residents chose home sites<br />

becaube of amenities such as open space, garden plots, or distance<br />

from major roads, rather than for the proximity bf old neighbors.<br />

, . .<br />

This was the shape and the character.of the new Hill village..<br />

The first response by many was to miss the 200:-year-old village<br />

they had left. Others were thankful that the community-had remained<br />

intact and that they were able to stay with their' friends and in<br />

the same basic locale.<br />

The preceeding narrative has attempted to provide a general account<br />

of the events of the pre-relocation, relocation, construction and<br />

post-construction periods. (For a chronological account of the<br />

major events surrounding the relocation, see Appendix D).<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!