29.11.2012 Views

Abstract Book

Abstract Book

Abstract Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Pearl River Delta (PRD) region including Hong Kong Special Administration<br />

Region (HKSAR) located in Southern China covering an area of fast economic growth<br />

with more than 60 million populations providing the work force for the manufacturing<br />

industries and economic activities in the region. The fast economic growth and the rapid<br />

industrialization have contributed to the deterioration of air quality causing frequent acid<br />

rain occurrences and haze days in the PRD region. In recent year, great efforts have been<br />

made by central and regional governments to control air pollution emission.<br />

Power plant has been identified as one of the major industrial air pollution sources and<br />

this paper introduces the emission control technologies commonly applied for power<br />

plant under different installed capacity and fuel type for coal or heavy oil-fired power<br />

plant. Different air pollution control technologies for the removal of sulphur dioxide,<br />

nitrogen oxides and particulate will be discussed in terms of technological, availability,<br />

applicability, operation and maintenance issues. Reference will be made to the recently<br />

published Mid-term Review of Pearl River Delta (PRD) Regional Air Quality<br />

Management Plan and National Technical Guidelines for the control of emissions from<br />

power plant. This paper also discusses the approach adopted by the HKSAR Government<br />

in controlling air emissions from the power stations and the lessons learnt from the<br />

emission control strategies and the way forward for the PRD region.<br />

A Cost-effective Advanced Monitoring Solution - Deployment Of Predictive<br />

Emissions Monitoring System As Compliance Solution For Gas Turbine And Boiler<br />

Applications In The United States (129)<br />

B. G. Swanson, 1 T. K. Eisenmann 2 ; 1 CMC Solutions LLC, Wixom, MI, 2 CMC Solutions<br />

LLC, Munich, Germany<br />

Sources required to continuously monitor emissions for compliance determination may<br />

elect to use alternatives to continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) in the<br />

United States. These alternatives include parametric and predictive emissions monitoring<br />

systems (PEMS). The alternative methods for compliance determination available on the<br />

market today are to be discussed. The requirements for such alternative monitoring<br />

systems including performance specification testing required under 40 CFR Part 60 (PS<br />

16) and 40 CFR Part 75 (Subpart E) are highlighted.<br />

Predictive emission monitoring solutions have been deployed for NOx, SO2 and CO<br />

compliance under applicable regulations for gas turbines and boilers in utility,<br />

petrochemical, ethanol, steel, and other industrial and municipal applications. Certified<br />

PEMS have allowed plants to replace CEMS on boiler and gas turbine exhaust stacks<br />

resulting in a greater than 50% reduction in ongoing operational costs of compliance<br />

monitoring programs. This paper is detailing the differences of existing PEMS solutions.<br />

Results of certification and the costs associated with the installation and ongoing<br />

operation of PEMS in lieu of CEMS with gas analyzers are demonstrated with examples<br />

of a U.S. cogeneration facility. In addition, PEMS quality assurance including relative<br />

accuracy test audits (RATA) is outlined and evaluated. Not least, other regulatory<br />

requirements and methods used for international applications are also reviewed and an<br />

overview of activities to use PEMS outside the United States shall be given.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!